Wal-Mart to Add Solar to Settle CA GHG Lawsuits
Wal-Mart Stores has agreed to install solar systems at two planned California superstores as a means of settling two lawsuits it faced over future emissions at the sites.
The settlement calls for Wal-Mart to install rooftop solar panels, efficient heating and cooling systems and LED lighting at the two stores, reports the Press-Enterprise.
Under the agreement, Wal-Mart must install three rooftop solar facilities of at least 250 kilowatts, according to a press release.
Wal-Mart also said it would look for ways to make refrigerators at existing California stores more efficient.
Additionally, Wal-Mart will contribute $120,000 to Mojave Desert Land Trust, which is trying to expand Joshua Tree National Park.
The lawsuits have held back development of the stores for more than two years.
In 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity filed suit challenging the city of Perris’s approval of the Perris Marketplace, a 520,000-square-foot, big-box retail development that would include a 24-hour Wal-Mart Supercenter and generate, according to CBD, close to 40,000 daily vehicle trips.
In 2008, the Center for Biological Diversity and a consortium of groups in the Morongo Basin each filed a lawsuit against the Town of Yucca Valley, challenging the town’s approval of a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
Both lawsuits were filed on the basis that the stores’ emissions would violate California greenhouse gas emissions standards set by the California Environmental Quality Act, reports the Los Angeles Times.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Bridgewater, MA, Gets $231,000 Efficiency Grant
- Biomass Group Studies Role in Clean Power Plan
- Rockleigh Borough Installing LEDs, Low Energy AC
- PHG to Build Big Gasification Plant for Sevier Solid Waste
- Energy Profile of Commercial Buildings Changing
- Smart Meter Market Surging
- Modular Data Centers Cut Construction Costs
- Failure to Build Energy Infrastructure Could Cost New England $5.4B