March 15, 2010
P&G Expands ‘Future Friendly’ Marketing Effort
Procter & Gamble is expanding its Future Friendly marketing effort that promotes environmental responsibility under the guise of consumer education.
P&G, which owns Tide, Pampers, PUR and Duracell, among other brands, first introduced Future Friendly at the 2009 Clinton Global Initiative in September of 2009.
Now, with a full marketing launch kicking off the week of March 29, P&G hopes to reach or exceed its original pledge of providing conservation education to at least 50 million U.S. households by the end of 2010.
In addition to television advertising and an extensive social networking and consumer engagement component, more than 15,000 retail locations will participate in the initial phase of Future Friendly.
Future Friendly-labeled products will begin to hit the shelves in early April.
Tide laundry detergent provides an example of how P&G intends to market its items under the plan.
P&G says that about 80 percent of the energy consumed in a typical load of laundry comes from heating water. So, Tide will urge consumers to wash in cold water, using Tide Coldwater, of course.
Tide Coldwater products will carry the Future Friendly seal.
Television ads start March 29, and P&G’s April edition of its brandSaver newspaper supplement, will be delivered to more than 50 million households. The coupon insert will feature information about and coupons for Future Friendly products.
Also in support of the national launch of the marketing program, P&G and Ipsos Public Affairs have released findings from theĀ “Consumer Conservation Survey.”
- About 74 percent of consumers say they would switch to another brand if it helped them conserve resources without having to pay more.
- About 37 percent say the reason they don’t lead a more environmentally-friendly lifestyle is a lack of enough information about what to do.
- About 58 percentĀ say they would be at least very likely to change the way they perform daily chores if it helped them reduce waste, save energy and save water at home.
Environmental management & energy news delivered daily to your inbox
Advertisers
Trends in Sustainability Performance Management
Take the lead on sustainability. - Take the lead in your industry. >>
Sustainable Agricultural Partnerships Summit
Aug 10-11, San Francisco - Measure & Reduce Water & Carbon Impacts. >>
Can you take the pain out of carbon reporting?
See how with CA ecoSoftware. >>
Recent Daily News [ see all ]
- 07/29/2010
- 07/28/2010
- 07/27/2010
- CEC Throws Out Edison’s Claim to RECs from Mountain View Wind Projects
- Green Rating Systems: Which One is Right for You?
- Russian City Saves $26,000 Annually with LED Street Lighting
- Arizona’s Energy-Efficiency Ruling to Save Utility Customers $9B over Next Decade
- IBM Partnerships to Boost Energy Efficiency in Buildings
- Brea to Cut City’s Energy Use 40%
- Zotos Mfg Plant Gets Nod to Build 3.3-MW Wind Power Project
- Roundup – Porsche, UL Environment, EPA
- Robert Brunner On Solar Power For Handheld Devices
- HVAC Energy Reduction SW Saves Six NY Buildings 9.9M kWh Annually
- Roundup – Hormel Foods, BMW, Microsoft
- Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
- Wind Power Installations Drop to 2007 levels
- EV Roundup: Nissan, Chevrolet, Enterprise, PG&E, Schneider Electric, Raser
- No Renewable Electricity Standard in Reid Energy Bill
- Vermont Resort Cuts Carbon Footprint with ‘Cow Power’
- CCS Technologies to Capture 65% and 90% of CO2 Emissions at Coal Power Plants
- Fuel Cell Power Plant Installed at Frozen Food Processing Plant
- Green Building Talked Up By Perkins & Will’s Peter Busby
- Large Wind Projects Get Ready to Roll in Arizona, California
- Why the BP Oil Spill is a Tragedy of the Commons, Part II
- Senators Push for a Renewable Energy Standard
- Roundup – GM, Seventh Generation, Wal-Mart
- Consumers Prefer to Charge their EVs at Home
- UPS Sustainability Report: Sets Goal to Improve Fuel Efficiency by 20%
- IT Sector Reduces Energy Costs by $2B, CO2 Emissions by 32 Million Tons
- Naval Base Lighting Retrofits Save Nearly $60,000 Annually
- TIAA-CREF CEO On Building Energy Efficiency
Charts [ see all ]
White Papers [ see all ]
- Your Customers Want Green!
- Eco-Competitiveness: Safeguarding Profitability and the World's Natural Resources
- Global Trends In Sustainability Performance Management
- The EPA's Mandatory Reporting Rule
- A Business Framework for Excelling at Enterprise Carbon Management
- Your Customers Want Green!
- What's On Your Sustainability Dashboard?
- 9 Ways to Reduce Energy Costs
Comments and Discussions
Matt Perry on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Hi Emily, Thank you for your article. Your background in science really comes through...."
Girard Gurgick on No Renewable Electricity Standard in Reid Energy Bill
"Does any one know why just passing a simple carbon tax is not the primary..."
Baltazar Perez on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"Great article Emily and certainly environmental issues should be at the forefront..."
Tony Nocito on EPA Supports Superfund Tax Reinstatement
"Each one of the industries mentioned in this article are laden with asbestos. All of the..."
Terrence Murray on Wind Power Installations Drop to 2007 levels
"We had been hearing for a couple of months now from our project finance banking..."
Martyn on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"There’s one area of corporate Greenwash that really irks me and that’s the..."
sandee loeffler on Green Marketing: How It Works and When to Use It
"We have just released a new packaging item for our plants to replace the 15 tons..."







Reader Comments
If a product is to be considered as “earth-friendly”, then it should include being environmentally SUSTAINABILE… produced in such a way that it does not damage the environment (like rainforests) or cause species extinction.
I wonder… does P&G consider their contribution to the rampant deforestation of precious rainforests and the brutal, mass slaughter of orangutans (& other wildlife) “future-friendly”?
Sure, why not? Many other companies do. Thousands of products are labeled or certified with the following: “cruelty-free” or “animal-friendly”
and the horribly disgraceful “no animal-testing on this finished product” (this admits that 1 or more ingredients WERE ANIMAL TESTED before being added to final product).
For information about P&G’s connection, please visit this site – http://www.greenthefilm.com/
Be sure to check out the menu list. Other, more shocking companies (believe me, if you are an animal or earth lover, you will be outraged) are also to blame.
Julie S | March 15th, 2010
I think this is a great initiative for P&G. Sure, they still have a long way to go, but any step towards environmental sustainability is a step in the right direction. As long this represents an actual shift on P&G’s stand regarding the environment (and not just a marketing stunt), I believe we should applaud this kind of initiatives. After all, we do need big corporations on board if we’re serious about climate change.
Sofia Ribeiro | March 16th, 2010
So if other big CPG companies all start coming up with their own versions of so-called eco-friendly brand labeling we’ll end up with such labels confusing customers and meaning nothing at all. There should be one (or two?) labels that CPG brands can earn from an independent testing source that has strict requirements for approval. Not some made up effort backed by millions of dollars in advertising spending.
Roberto Strajjio | April 7th, 2010
Proctor & Gamble promotes disposable products to the utmost. need i say more?
LOUISE | June 16th, 2010
P & G promotes disposables.
LOUISE | June 16th, 2010