<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navy, Army Push to Meet Renewable Energy Goals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/03/18/navy-army-push-to-meet-renewable-energy-goals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/03/18/navy-army-push-to-meet-renewable-energy-goals/</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagan Srinivasan</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/03/18/navy-army-push-to-meet-renewable-energy-goals/comment-page-1/#comment-189958</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagan Srinivasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 22:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=33657#comment-189958</guid>
		<description>Deepwater Structures Inc. (DSI) has developed an innovative and cost effective Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) energy technology for the globe. The technology would effectively do the climate change, business, infrastructure and the environment of the global world. Renewable energy technologies are in general not cost effective. Wind, wave, current, tide, geothermal, solar etc are either not 100% reliable or not cost effective to invest. Their role in climate change, business, infrastructure and environment are limited.
DSI OTEC is the only energy technology that would impact climate change, business, infrastructure and environment on the future earth. It would effectively reduce the global warming and control CO2 emission. DSI uses deep water oil and gas technologies to make the 1881 French Scientist dream into reality. DSI-OTEC could effectively change global energy business within the next decade. DSI 1000 mega watt OTEC power unit desing is ready to be fabricated for commertial and navy applications. The 1000 MW power plant capital cost is 3billion USD. The 100 MW OTEC power plant cost $400 million.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deepwater Structures Inc. (DSI) has developed an innovative and cost effective Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) energy technology for the globe. The technology would effectively do the climate change, business, infrastructure and the environment of the global world. Renewable energy technologies are in general not cost effective. Wind, wave, current, tide, geothermal, solar etc are either not 100% reliable or not cost effective to invest. Their role in climate change, business, infrastructure and environment are limited.<br />
DSI OTEC is the only energy technology that would impact climate change, business, infrastructure and environment on the future earth. It would effectively reduce the global warming and control CO2 emission. DSI uses deep water oil and gas technologies to make the 1881 French Scientist dream into reality. DSI-OTEC could effectively change global energy business within the next decade. DSI 1000 mega watt OTEC power unit desing is ready to be fabricated for commertial and navy applications. The 1000 MW power plant capital cost is 3billion USD. The 100 MW OTEC power plant cost $400 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shellback</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/03/18/navy-army-push-to-meet-renewable-energy-goals/comment-page-1/#comment-188465</link>
		<dc:creator>Shellback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=33657#comment-188465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather they stick to their core mission and leave this PC bullshit to the USDA or HUD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather they stick to their core mission and leave this PC bullshit to the USDA or HUD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2010/03/18/navy-army-push-to-meet-renewable-energy-goals/comment-page-1/#comment-185901</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=33657#comment-185901</guid>
		<description>The US army seems like a wasteful lot if you ask me. A small example: the army has a recruiting facility on the beach in Panama City, FL. Overnight, when non-one is around (to recruit or be recruited) a generator pumps into the night, flooding lights on the beach that no-one will see. I think the army start dealing with making its practices more efficient first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US army seems like a wasteful lot if you ask me. A small example: the army has a recruiting facility on the beach in Panama City, FL. Overnight, when non-one is around (to recruit or be recruited) a generator pumps into the night, flooding lights on the beach that no-one will see. I think the army start dealing with making its practices more efficient first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

