In Sustainable Marketing, Words Matter
Today, we face a sophisticated language problem – and therefore opportunity – when it comes to green marketing. It seems that the meme of âgreenwashingâ has subsided a bit. In fact, the âgotchaâ green marketing moment in 2009 was not about greenwashing at all.
The most exciting moment for authentically green marketers was the promotion of ABCâs re-released mini-series âV.” You may recall that ABC was planning to skywrite giant red Vâs above national monuments to promote the seriesâ return.Â Lisa de Moraes, writing for the WashingtonPost, pointed out that Disney (ABCâs parent company) had âonly seven months earlier announced — one day ahead of its annual shareholder meeting in its âcorporate responsibilityâ report — that it would cut carbon emissions from fuels by half by 2012.âÂ ABC cancelled the promotion.
So the watershed moment in green marketing was not about misleading green marketing claims, it was about a promotion that was not in line with a parent companyâs own sustainability goals.
Clearly, this greenwashing thing is getting more interesting. The ways and the words we choose to promote literally have more meaning today than in Ogilvyâs day. Language shapes culture and culture shapes language. I wonât rehash the complexity of Linguistic Relativity, just suffice it to say that language influences thought and certain kinds of non-linguistic behavior. 19th Century philosopher/linguist Wilhelm von Humboldt saw language as âthe expression of the spirit of a nationâ. Understanding this is a huge opportunity in marketing and progressing the sustainability agenda.
Letâs take the word âhybridâ for example. In the short history of the modern marketing meaning of the word, âhybridâ has gone from a word used to define the mechanics of an automobile to a lifestyle identifier by Keen shoes in their ad campaign anchored in the phrase âHybridLife.”Â In this manifestation, âHybridLifeâ becomes a conjunctive badge defining the wearer as athletic and pro-environment. Linguistically, âhybridâ is now a modifier. Culturally, it modifies.
The inverse is true was well. Language can be a destructive force on culture as well. For example, âanchor babyâ used to define the children born to illegal immigrants, has been a sleeping phrase since the early 80âs when it was used to describe Vietnamese emigrants, has come back with the recent legislative controversies in Arizona. This divisive language serves as, literally, a cultural divide. But, more theoretically, it also serves to drive culture backwards away from completing its contract to be a socially just society.
In short, words matter – but not in a âchoose them wiselyâ kind of way – words matter because they can be used to engineer or derail progress.
In terms of greenwashing, we should not just be looking at the factuality or obfuscation of marketing messages.Â Instead, we should be expecting them to do more than market in accurate and sometimes entertaining ways. The words we choose, the way we use them, can change our culture for the better. They can create genuine dialogue and move the proverbial needle to a more just and verdant place.
John Rooks is the founder of The SOAP Group and the author of More Than Promote âA Monkeywrencherâs Guide to Authentic Marketing.
Energy Manager News
- Window Films: Low Hanging Fruit for Efficiency Gains
- Some Insurance Companies Invested Too Heavily in Fossil Fuels, says Ceres
- Apple Defends 100% Renewable Energy Claim
- Ontario Investing $900M in Affordable Housing
- ERC: Price Benchmark Trends Week Ending May 20, 2016
- CAL-ISO Study: Regional Energy Market Could Yield $1.5B in Savings Annually to Ratepayers
- Sands to Stay, But MGM and Wynn Still Plan to Leave NV Energy
- Turning Data into Knowledgeâand Action