Our Grand Evolutionary Experiment: Generation Green
If you were to trace your DNA back a thousand years, youâd find you are made up of roughly equal genetic contributions of millions of ancestors. The odds against all of these genes surviving to eventually produce you were immense. But many of these genes helped your ancestors act âselfishlyâ to survive. And they live on in your instincts to protect yourself and your children. They help define the involuntary reactions to a hot stove or an oncoming car. They help activate the hormones that shape parenting behavior. And put blandly, they help spur the instinctive need for the act of reproduction.
In other words, every one of you is an evolutionary experiment that succeeded in the laboratory of Earth. Congratulations!
Yet when we examine these âselfishâ genes at a larger scale, we begin to see worrying consequences.
Dr. Jared Diamond shows that the most successful early hominids exhibited two main patterns: highly efficient genocide (in this case, of Neanderthals) and natural resource destruction (exhibited by die-offs of large mammals). As human populations grew, so did the incidence of these patterns, to the point where they are now so common they donât always make the news.
Rapid industrialization and mass consumption have driven natural resources destruction to the point where we are effectively conducting an uncontrolled experiment on the ecological services that helped us flourish as a species – Â quietly unplugging our life support systems one-by-one. The end result of all of this is that we are the first generation to face the prospect of delivering to our heirs a planet no longer capable of supporting human life.
Fortunately, we are not simply the sum of our genetic parts. Famed Harvard biologist E.O. Wilson points out roughly 10,000 years ago, when agriculture allowed us to settle, culture took over as the driving force for humankindâs evolution. This led to three uniquely human developments: urbanization, intellectual property, and technology.
First, urbanization. Settled civilizations enhanced quality-of-life and decreased the need for manual laborers (otherwise known as children at the time). Now that the majority of us live in cities, birth rates are slowing to the point where, in our lifetimes, global human population is expected to plateau, making less elusive the goal of sustainable consumption.
Second, intellectual property. This rewards an individual (and by extension, his or her âselfish genesâ) for developing something that improves the life of others. It is likely no coincidence that the steam engine, which helped launch the Industrial Revolution, was developed where intellectual property was protected by law.
Third, technology. Settled civilization took fuller advantage of our speciesâ unique capacity to learn from one another, leading eventually to clusters of innovators like Silicon Valley. It is from clusters like these that we gain technological tools that will help reverse ecological imbalance. For example:
Ever been frustrated with a clientâs instinct to reduce first costs at all costs, rather than take a whole systems view? Understandable. Our brains struggle with complex problems and try to simplify them down into their component parts. But thereâs now no need to rewire our brains. Software as a service â better known as âthe cloudâ – is redefining knowledge from what one information an individual knows, to what one information an individual can access. Take, for example, the incredible amount of data and compute power that makes building performance analysis faster and more available.
Ever been frustrated with navigating the vast sea of information on, say, toxics in building products? Technology can make this not only more easily searchable, but also draw from disciplines you typically wouldnât. Take, for example, the Biomimicry Instituteâs online database, where architects and engineers can search the biological literature for natureâs tried-and-tested solutions to todayâs design challenges, such as self-cleaning paint (full disclosure: Autodesk is a partner of the Biomimicry Institute).
Ever been frustrated by the fact that no single company can serve your needs every step of a workflow? By recognizing this fact and addressing it through partnership, companies in innovation clusters are more resilient in the marketplace, just like symbiotic species in an ecosystem. Take, for example, the way third-party developers large and small are localizing othersâ software tools for building energy code compliance.
By harnessing these three uniquely human developments â urbanization, intellectual property, and technology, you will shape the next phase of human evolution. In essence, you have the long-term survival of the species in your hands.
Emma Stewart, Ph.D., is currently the Senior Manager for AEC Sustainability Solutions at Autodesk where she leads the design software companyâs efforts to make sustainable design easy, cost-effective and routine across the building and infrastructure industries. Emma holds a Ph.D. in Environmental Science and Management from Stanford University and a B.A. Honors degree in Human Sciences from Oxford University.
Energy Manager News
- Better Buildings, Better Plants: 12 Success Stories
- CA Governor Signs Bill Clarifying PACE Disclosures
- CA School District to Get 73% of Energy From Solar Carports
- Two Critical Questions to Ask Yourself About Your Current Energy Contract
- Pepco and Exelon Say Customers Have Benefitted$440 Million Since Merger
- ICC Issues Stringent Consumer Protection Rules For Retail Electric Suppliers
- Teslaâs Battery Storage Device Put to Use. Time to Exhale?
- Variable Speed Drives are a Powerful Efficiency Tool