Shell Wins Emissions Reduction Advertising Battle
Nonprofit ActionAid UK had challenged that the advert, which called the fuels “one of the most effective ways of reducing CO2 from cars and trucks today,” was misleading. ActionAid said that evidence showed that biofuels did not reduce CO2 emissions from vehicles when the full life-cycle of the fuel was taken into account.
But the ASA ruled in favor of Shell yesterday stating that the company had provided data for biofuels manufactured in the U.S. and Brazil for distribution in the U.S. and Europe and that that data had shown that its biofuel did indeed have the capability to reduce CO2 emissions compared to that of petrol over its life-cycle.
Shell has been accused of overplaying its environmental credentials in advertising before. In 2009, Greenpeace took issue with an advert that it claimed suggested that more of Shell’s revenue was derived from renewable sources than was true.
In 2007, Friends of the Earth Europe filed simultaneous complaints to the national advertising standards authorities of Belgium, the Netherlands, and the U.K. about a Shell advertisement depicting the outline of an oil refinery emitting flowers rather than smoke.
Energy Manager News
- Price of Carbon Credits Rises In Europe, Which is a Good Thing
- Iowa Utilities Get Pushback on Plans for Higher Rooftop Solar Rates
- Driving Energy Efficiency in Leased Commercial Space is Complicated – and Worthwhile
- Will Co-Firing Natural Gas and Coal Meet Clean Power Plan Standards?
- Pitkin County (CO) Looks for Solar Opportunities
- Solar Panels Working as Promised for Iowa Company
- China and India: Doing the Unimaginable to Address Climate Change
- Maine Solar Bill That Advocates Claim Could Save $100M Is Vetoed by Governor LePage