If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now
Dr Pepper

Dr Pepper, Coca-Cola, Pepsi Spend Millions on Water Quality

Dr Pepper Snapple Group has pledged $1 million over the next four years to protect Texas watersheds that provide water for its bottling plants.

The money will fund preservation and restoration projects at five of the Nature Conservancy’s preserves — covering about 7,500 acres of land — in the watersheds of the Trinity and Brazos Rivers, the Texas Gulf Coast and the Edwards Aquifer, which serve the state’s three largest metropolitan areas: Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio.

It’s one of the latest in a series of beverage-company funded projects to improve water quality and ensure companies’ access to fresh water.

“Water sustainability and water management issues is a big thing right now and is going to be a long-term trend, especially in the beverage industry because water is the primary ingredient in their product, but it’s something we’re seeing across all markets,” Frost & Sullivan research analyst Ankur Jajoo said.

According to USA Today, big players including Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Miller and MolsonCoors, as well as regional beverage companies, list long-term water supply as a risk.

A June report from Ceres said Anheuser-Busch InBev, Coca-Cola and Pepsi are among the 27 percent of companies assessed that made the connection between climate change and water risk in 2011, up from 10 percent in 2009.

In 2006, the industry’s big guns including Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Anheuser-Busch, Bacardi, Nestle Waters, Ocean Spray and others created the Beverage Industry Environmental Roundtable to address water and energy issues.

USA Today says experts put the total amount of money invested in water conservation projects by beverage companies over the past five years at more than $500 million.

For example, Dr Pepper started cleaning bottles with air instead of water on 56 production lines in 2010. Its LEED Silver-certified distribution center in Victorville, Calif. uses a reverse-osmosis filtration system and recovers 50 percent of the purification system’s discharge.

By 2015, the company plans to cut water use and wastewater discharge 10 percent per gallon of finished product, compared to 2009 levels.

Coca-Cola has developed a beverage process water recovery system that can reduce a manufacturing plant’s water use by up to 35 percent. The company has pledged to improve water efficiency 20 percent by the end of 2012 compared with a 2004 baseline.

Last year, Pepsi met its goal of improving water use efficiency 20 percent by 2015, compared with a 2006 baseline. The company also says it will provide 3 million people with access to clean drinking water by 2015.

Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

  
Right On Time
Sponsored By: Gensuite

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Planning for a Sustainable Future
Sponsored By: Dakota Software

  

3 thoughts on “Dr Pepper, Coca-Cola, Pepsi Spend Millions on Water Quality

  1. Natural Capital – pure and simple is what drives wealth creation. It is good to see that corporations are seeing the value of ecosystems. It is like truncated economists growing up to become tree huggers, not for the trees’ sake, but their own.

  2. Coca Cola may be spruiking its green credentials in the US, but in Australia at the moment it is the largest and best funded opponent of a national container deposit system. We are trying to take a container deposit system that has worked in one of our states very effectively for 30 years, and roll it out nationwide. Coke is the main funder and opponent of the system. The system is likely to add $0.005 (half a penny) to the price of a can of Coke (excluding the refundable $0.10 deposit). The system has increased recycling rates of containers from 40% to 80% in parts of the state that has used a container deposit system. The energy and water savings of that sort of recycling rate are significant, but not significant enough for Coke to support it.

  3. It is quite surprising to see the bottle deposit scheme is so difficult to implement in some countries. In Germany, for example, bottle deposits are the norm and this has resulted in a huge decrease in waste, in particular with water bottles. But it is good to see that the beverage giants are improving the quality of drinking water. With that and the increasing PR that the best way to hydrate is by drinking water, the population might become healthier.

Leave a Comment