EPA Releases 2012 Chemical Data
The CDR database contains comprehensive use and exposure information on the most widely used chemicals in the United States.
Companies are now required to provide information on chemicals used in children‚Äôs and other consumer products, along with reports on commercial applications and industrial uses of chemicals. For the first time ever, the EPA also required companies to substantiate confidentiality claims in order to ensure that as much information as possible is made available to the public.
The 2012 Chemical Data Reporting information will help EPA and others better assess chemicals, evaluate potential exposures and use, and expand efforts to encourage the use of safer chemicals, the EPA says.
The CDR rule, the source of this new data, was issued under the Toxic Substances Control Act. The rule requires companies that manufacture or import chemicals to report manufacturing and import data every four years when site-specific production volume exceeds 25,000 lb.
This report is for calendar year 2011. The EPA received reports on 7,674 chemicals, including 354 that were reported as used in children‚Äôs products, 1,704 in consumer products and 3,073 in commercial applications or products. The remaining chemicals reported were for industrial use only.
The CDR information includes data on chemicals that are used in children‚Äôs products such as toys, playground and sporting equipment, arts and crafts materials, and textiles and furniture.
Chemicals used in consumer products, particularly those intended for children, present potential for direct exposure to the public and are priorities for assessment by the agency, the EPA said. Although reporting on these chemicals is compulsory, currently there are no requirements under TSCA that existing chemicals be evaluated for safety.
In September 2011, the¬†American Chemistry Council proposed a¬†system for prioritizing the EPA’s chemical review and assessment.¬†The council said that the EPA lacked a “consistent, transparent process” for evaluating which chemicals need further evaluation, and that the agency risks wasting time and resources gathering information on chemicals that are already well understood or do not pose a health or environmental risk.¬†ACC said that its¬†prioritization tool, drawn up in consultation with member companies, would allow the EPA to apply objective criteria to prioritize chemicals for further review.
Stay Up-to-Date On Environmental Management, Energy & Sustainability News with EL's Free Daily Newsletter
Energy Manager News
- Portland Likely to Require Energy Benchmarking
- Using Building Energy Management for Factories
- New Energy System Will Save Stanford $420M
- Tire Plant Earns Superior Energy Performance Gold Certification
- Acuity Brands Acquires Indoor Location Software Company
- NJ School District Hires Honeywell for Energy Upgrades
- CODA Energy 50 kWh Storage Tower Achieves UL Certification
- Con Edison Development Procures GE Energy Storage System