Coke Slams Guidelines – but GRI Argues its Case
The latest version of the Global Reporting Initiativeâs Sustainability Reporting Guidelines â G4 â will require companies only to provide disclosures and indicators relevant to their business, a GRI spokesperson said, denying claims that G4 will impose a greater burden on companies.
The reporting company itself will determine what indicators to report, Marjolein Baghuis said.Â Additionally, G4 will provide greater clarity on the distinction between “what to report on” and “how to report,”Â according to Baghuis.
The guidelines will be launched at the Global Conference on Sustainability and Reporting in May. Baghuis said work is still being done on the final version of G4 â and noted it will be very different from the exposure draft that was circulated for public comment in 2012.
G4 will be more âuser friendlyâ for both existing and new reporting companies, Baghuis said, in response to a Guardian articleÂ that said proposed changes to the guidelines could make them too complex and burdensome to businesses.
Coca-Cola Enterprisesâ Lucinda Hensman told the Guardian: âOur companyâs need to engage more people in our sustainability work is seemingly at odds with the direction in which sustainability reporting guidelines are moving. Indeed, increasingly prescriptive requirements of expert audiences â the GRI G4 guidelines are a case in point â may in fact make the audience for our reporting more limited.â
Another company said: âIf the expectations of G4 cannot be simplified, existing reporters may begin to step away from GRI, and new reporters may not be in a position to report against the guidelines at all.â
Baghuis says many of the criticisms in the blog are a reaction to the exposure draft. She told Environmental Leader the exposure draft âwas never intended as a âdraft version of G4â â it was there to generate input, to make G4 the best GRI Guidelines yet.â
Sustainability experts, organizations and professionals made aÂ recordÂ 3,095 formal feedback submissions on the exposure draft during two 90-day public comment periods.
The feedback identified several patterns, Baghuis says. âAmong these were recommendations that the G4 draft be improved in terms of focus, simplicity and clarity, and that it provide better support to small businesses and beginner reporters.â She says these ideas will be incorporated into the final draft.
Energy Manager News
- Clean Energy Commitment in the Corporate and Local Small Business Sphere
- MIT Develops Promising New Battery Storage Technology
- Xcel Asks for $90M âSwitching Feeâ If Lubbock Utility Joins ERCOT
- EDF Sending 127 Climate Corps Fellows to 100 Organizations
- Capegemini, Siemens Working on Analytics Platform
- Fulham Retrofit Kits EPA Approved
- Brookings Study: Net Metering Offers Cost Benefits to All Utility Customers
- Window Films: Low Hanging Fruit for Efficiency Gains