US Lags in Sustainability Reporting Assurance
While more than half (53 percent) of all companies in the S&P 500 Index and Fortune 500 published sustainability reports in 2011 — up from 19 percent the year before — companies in the US are less likely to obtain third-party assurance than their global peers, according to a report by the Global Reporting Initiative.
Assurance refers to third-party validation of a sustainability report’s contents.
The GRI Focal Point USA analysis, conducted in collaboration with GRI’s US Data Partner and Organizational Stakeholder Governance & Accountability Institute, finds the current growth in corporate reporting in the US is exceeding the global average growth.
However, Trends in External Assurance of Sustainability Reports – Spotlight on the USA, finds in the US, only 10 percent (26 out of 269 reporters) of GRI framework sustainability reports obtained external assurance in 2011. The international percentage is much higher at 38 percent.
To show commitment to greater transparency and demonstrate the reliability of the data in a sustainability report, organizations often choose to have the report externally assured by an independent third party. The GRI recommends this practice in the Framework, but does not require it.
By obtaining external assurance companies communicate to the users of the report (investors and other stakeholders) that information is reliable and the organization has taken a credible approach to reporting its ESG disclosure.
The analysis finds most assured reports in the US in 2011 were Application Level B reports (see chart). Globally, assured reports were more likely to be from Application Level A reports.
The system has three levels: A, B and C with the reporting criteria at each level reflecting the extent of application or coverage of the GRI Reporting Framework. Application Level A reports contain the most disclosures.
Additionally, the study identified a total of 30 different assurance statements, with several of the reports containing more than one assurance statement. Forty percent of providers in the sample were traditional accountancy firms, followed by about 35 percent from engineering firms and 25 percent from other professional services firms.
GRI is preparing an updated version of its reporting guidelines, known as G4.
In February, GRI said that the new guidelines will require companies only to provide disclosures and indicators relevant to their business, denying claims that G4 will impose a greater burden on companies. Coca Cola Enterprises was among those companies voicing concern over the new guidelines.
The GRI Guidelines now rank among the most widely recognized corporate social responsibility instruments among large European companies, according to research published in March by the European Commission.
Energy Manager News
- Behind the Meter Podcast: Seeing U-Haul’s HQ Parking Structure in a New (LED) Light
- Uninterruptible Power Supplies: The Case for Moving Beyond Batteries
- Nuclear Giant Exelon Wants to Invest in Wind Energy in Ohio
- Arby’s Reports on Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives
- Navigant: Smart Meter Sector Has “Plateaued”
- Poll: 75% of Large U.S. Corporations Say They Will Buy Renewables Within 18 Months
- Duke Energy Progress Customers to See Fuel Cost-Recovery Savings
- Energy-as-a-Service: Charting a Path Through Complexity