San Jose Considers Plastic Foam Ban
San Jose, Calif., will likely become the biggest city in the state, if not the US, to ban plastic foam food containers following a City Council vote today, the San Jose Mercury News reports.
Proponents say the plastic foam, called “expanded polystyrene” or EPS, ends up in landfills because there’s no market for recycling the food takeout containers. They also argue alternatives such as paper and aluminum foil cost less, are less polluting and lower trash volume garbage collection rates, the newspaper reports.
Restaurants, caterers, delis and other food providers will see operating costs rise San Jose adopts a ban, the California Restaurant Association warns. The industry group says expanded polystyrene containers are two to three times more affordable than replacement products, which in some cases do not perform as well, especially for very hot and cold food and beverages.
On the other side of the country, more than 1,000 New York City businesses have written letters urging the City Council to oppose the proposed ban on polystyrene foam food service products, according to Restaurant Action Alliance NYC.
If passed, the bill would make it illegal for food establishments to give customers polystyrene foam containers starting July 1, 2015. It would also also ban polystyrene packaging, or “packing peanuts.”
Restaurant Action Alliance NYC says the legislation, which would force New York City’s some 18,000 restaurant to use alternative takeout containers, would increase business costs. It cites a March study from MB Public Affairs that says for every $1 now spent on polystyrene foam products, restaurants will have to spend at least $1.94 on replacements.
Photo Credit: Jon Callas via Flickr
Energy Manager News
- Entergy Arkansas Reaches Rate Settlement
- EMEX Named TEPA Aggregator/Broker/Consultant of the Year
- Switching to LEDs Without Leaving the Past Behind
- McKinstry Replacing 6,200 Lights with LEDs in Henderson, NV
- USDA Investing More than $300M in Efficiency, Renewables
- ERC Price Benchmark Trends Week Ending: October 21, 2016
- Could Cleaner Energy Save Ohio Ratepayers $50M in 2030, Alone?
- Yakima City Council Mulls Utility Rate Hike on Large Businesses to Bolster Reserve Fund