Exxon Calls Climate-Related Subpoenas an Assault on its Legal Rights
ExxonMobil Corp. will fight against a subpoena to try and see exactly what it has known about the effects of climate change, saying that the legal maneuver is an all-out assault on its constitutional rights. Thatâs what the Wall Street Journal is reporting, noting that Exxon is calling the efforts âchilling.â
The specific challenge that Exxon is now up against is that of US Virgin Islands, which is part of a broader group that wants to make Exxon pay for its inaction on climate change. News reports have said that Exxonâs internal research had indicated climate change to be environmentally damaging. Yet, the company chose to either ignore or to hide those findings.
âThe chilling effect of this inquiry, which discriminates based on viewpoint to target one side of an ongoing policy debate, strikes at protected speech at the core of the First Amendment,â Exxonâs filing says, as noted by the Wall Street Journal. The filing continues by accusing the attorney general of the Virgin Islands of having an âulterior motiveâ and of having no âreasonable suspicion.â
New Yorkâs Attorney General Eric Schneiderman started things off with his initial subpoena into Exxonâs earliest known activities and the impact that they might have on the oil developerâs shareholders. At least 17 jurisdictions in all are part of this inquiry. At the heart of the legal matter is that corporate managers are duty bound to tell their owners — their shareholders — everything that they know.
The legal and economic arguments for going after Exxon is fairly straight forward: If oil companies have known for decades that burning oil could result in irreparable ecological damages, they had the obligation to tell their owners this so that the shareholders could decide whether to sell their shares.
The political discussion is really something quite different. That is, environmental activists are taking every avenue they can to limit the burning of fossil fuels and to combat rising temperatures. The Wall Street Journal says that the tactic is similar to how activists went after the tobacco industry, ultimately holding it accountable for huge damages for not telling smokers that it had long-known smoking caused cancer and was harmful to oneâs health.
âFossil fuel companies that deceived investors and consumers about the dangers of climate change must be held accountable,â said Maura Healey, Massachusettsâ attorney general, at a press conference.Â
To compound Exxonâs problems, the Center for International Environmental Law uncovered evidence nearly a half century ago that oil executives knew of the coming climate phenomenon: In 1968, the Stanford Research Institute issued a paper to the American Petroleum Institute saying that environmental changes could jeopardize the earthâs future.
âThese documents are the tip of an evidentiary iceberg that demands further investigation,â says Carroll Muffett, head of the environmental center. âOil companies had an early opportunity to acknowledge climate science and climate risks, and to enable consumers to make informed choices.Â They chose a different path.Â The public deserves to know why.â
As for Exxon, it has friends in some unexpected circles: environmental think tanks. Michael Shellenberger, former head of the Breakthrough Institute, has said that painting the oil giant as a âclimate change denierâ is misleading: “In reality, Exxon funded conservative think tanks that were mostly *not* âclimate deniersâ â & in many cases advocate climate policy!ââ he tweeted.
âThe allegations are based on the false premise that Exxon Mobil reached definitive conclusions about anthropogenic climate change before the worldâs experts and before the science itself had matured, and then withheld it from the broader scientific community. Such a claim is preposterous,â adds Suzanne McCarron, an Exxon spokeswoman, in a press release.
She says that the companyâs research decades ago âyielded no definitive conclusionsâ and that today âExxon Mobil recognizes the risks posed by climate change, and we believe that everyone should be engaged in meaningful action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.â
Ken Silverstein is editor-in-chief of Business Sector Media, publisher of Environmental Leader and Energy Manager Today.
*Donât miss ourÂ Environmental Leader 2016 ConferenceÂ Â in June.Â
Energy Manager News
- Driving Energy Efficiency by Improving the Owner/Tenant Relationship
- Case Study: Fast Payback in New York City
- $8M Project to Upgrade Chillicothe (OH) Correctional Institute
- Three Trends Align to Save Buildings Millions in Energy Costs
- Law Bars Energy Providers from Charging Early Termination Fees in the Event of Death
- Corporations Spend Big on Ballot Initiatives, Crushing Ratepayer Opposition
- Texas Retailer Offers Instant Rebate for Rooftop Solar, Offers High Credits for Excess Solar
- Local, State and the Federal Government Excel at Energy Efficiency