<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Leader &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel="next" href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/government/feed/?page=2" />

		<item>
		<title>Ontario May Follow California&#8217;s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/ontario-may-follow-californias-lead-on-tv-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/ontario-may-follow-californias-lead-on-tv-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/ontario-may-follow-californias-lead-on-tv-energy-efficiency/" title="Ontario May Follow California&#8217;s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/sony_flat_screen_tv1.64r70wt6zj8k4c8c88k4c08k4.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="180" alt="Ontario May Follow California&#8217;s Lead on TV Energy Efficiency" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Following California&#8217;s decision earlier this week to require elevated energy efficiency standards for TVs, the Canadian province of Ontario is considering a similar move.
On Nov. 18, California became the first state in the country to institute its own standards on energy efficiency of televisions sold within its borders. New TVs sold there must show reduced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/ontario-may-follow-californias-lead-on-tv-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/" title="National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/wind_on_the_water1.9djk9lchi3ok8ggs08cg0o0ss.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="120" alt="National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>National Grid for the second time has turned down a proposal from a Rhode Island offshore wind developer that wants to sell the electricity retailer energy from a yet-to-be-developed wind farm.
National Grid says the price to purchase renewable energy from New Jersey-based Deepwater Wind is too high, reports the Providence Journal. Deepwater is seeking to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California City&#8217;s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/california-citys-green-building-ordinance-applies-to-commercial-buildings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/california-citys-green-building-ordinance-applies-to-commercial-buildings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction & Refitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daly City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green building ordinance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Mateo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/california-citys-green-building-ordinance-applies-to-commercial-buildings/" title="California City&#8217;s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/san_mateo_office_bldg2.b48nc5kdgpkc40o0cscs8gkgs.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="239" alt="California City&#8217;s Green Building Ordinance Applies to Commercial Buildings" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>New commercial buildings in San Mateo, Calif., will have to be constructed to minimum environmental standards now that a previously voluntary green building ordinance has become mandatory.
The new standards take effect Jan. 1, reports the San Jose Mercury News. They had been voluntary for more than a year.
The law requires a minimum number of so-called [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/california-citys-green-building-ordinance-applies-to-commercial-buildings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/canada-delays-ghg-emissions-regs-russia-ups-emissions-cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/canada-delays-ghg-emissions-regs-russia-ups-emissions-cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-And-Trade System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenhouse Gas Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/canada-delays-ghg-emissions-regs-russia-ups-emissions-cuts/" title="Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/emissions62.6f67u3ujarokckg8k88w84wwk.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="98" alt="Canada Delays GHG Emissions Regs, Russia Ups Emissions Cuts" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Add Canada to a growing list of countries that want to wait until a global climate deal is struck and the United States decides how it will regulate emissions before they regulate their own greenhouse gas emissions. Earlier this week, New Zealand made a similar announcement. There also appears to be some widespread discussion over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/canada-delays-ghg-emissions-regs-russia-ups-emissions-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: &#8216;If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/trade-group-on-epa-chemical-regs-if-everything-is-a-priority-then-nothing-is-a-priority/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/trade-group-on-epa-chemical-regs-if-everything-is-a-priority-then-nothing-is-a-priority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grocery Manufacturers Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Substances Control Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House Of Representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/trade-group-on-epa-chemical-regs-if-everything-is-a-priority-then-nothing-is-a-priority/" title="Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: &#8216;If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority&#8217;"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/chemicals2_2n35dea34bk0sg0s0ow04gs8s_17ldmg3f9ou8088wk04c40sgo_th1.9xdu7qadwrccg0scwow0wwock.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="117" alt="Trade Group on EPA Chemical Regs: &#8216;If Everything is a Priority, Then Nothing is a Priority&#8217;" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>As the U.S. House of Representatives considers how far the EPA should go in regulating chemicals used in everyday products, trade groups are cautioning against over-regulation.
The Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection took comments on the EPA&#8217;s proposed overhaul the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which governs the country’s chemicals policies. EPA Administrator [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/trade-group-on-epa-chemical-regs-if-everything-is-a-priority-then-nothing-is-a-priority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/av-equipment-gets-new-energy-star-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/av-equipment-gets-new-energy-star-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products & Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio/Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home theater]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/av-equipment-gets-new-energy-star-requirements/" title="A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/energy_star_logo.3bqiqarrieiogoko88ksws8sg.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="140" alt="A/V Equipment Gets New Energy Star Requirements" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Audio/video products such as home theaters, DVD players and docking stations, among others, will face more stringent energy efficiency requirements to qualify for the EPA&#8217;s Energy Star label.
Version 2.0 of the EPA&#8217;s A/V Energy Star requirements are effective immediately. For products previously or currently carrying the label, the new requirements will be effective July 30, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/19/av-equipment-gets-new-energy-star-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/u-s-china-partner-on-renewable-energy-energy-efficiency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/u-s-china-partner-on-renewable-energy-energy-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding & Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCS Projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Car Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electric Vehicles Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hu Jintao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart grids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/u-s-china-partner-on-renewable-energy-energy-efficiency/" title="U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/obamajintao41.dzah8ywivxssgoogwog84k8cs.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="122" alt="U.S., China Partner on Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>President Barack Obama and China&#8217;s President Hu Jintao have agreed to a wide ranging package of programs and initiatives (seven in total) to strengthen the two countries&#8217; cooperation on renewable energy and energy efficiency. One key program establishes a U.S.-China Clean Energy Research Center, supported by $150 million in public and private funds over the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/u-s-china-partner-on-renewable-energy-energy-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/usps-energy-use-down-9-from-2005-to-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/usps-energy-use-down-9-from-2005-to-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance & Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper & Packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Postal Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USPS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/usps-energy-use-down-9-from-2005-to-2008/" title="USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=27443&amp;w=180" width="180" height="141" alt="USPS Energy Use Down 9% From 2005 to 2008" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>In its first-ever sustainability report, the U.S. Postal Service showed a decrease in total energy use of 9 percent from 2005 to 2008. In 2008 the agency used 123 million gigajoules, compared to 131 million GJ in 2007, 134 million GJ in 2006 and 136 million GJ in 2005.
The USPS reduced energy use at its [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/usps-energy-use-down-9-from-2005-to-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/epa-may-regulate-sulfur-dioxide-emissions-on-hourly-basis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/epa-may-regulate-sulfur-dioxide-emissions-on-hourly-basis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Lung Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asthma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental protection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur dioxide]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/epa-may-regulate-sulfur-dioxide-emissions-on-hourly-basis/" title="EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/emissions44.cpkng0k2nagogw08gkg0sk0sw.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="123" alt="EPA May Regulate Sulfur Dioxide Emissions on Hourly Basis" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Manufacturers and utilities that emit sulfur dioxide may soon fall under tighter regulation, as the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed new rules that set hourly requirements on emissions, the Wall Street Journal reports.
Currently, emissions standards are based on annualized or 24-hour averages and do not take into account the sort of short-term peaks that often [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/18/epa-may-regulate-sulfur-dioxide-emissions-on-hourly-basis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consensus: No Climate Deal at Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/consensus-no-climate-deal-at-copenhagen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/consensus-no-climate-deal-at-copenhagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APEC Leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen Meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions Trading Scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/consensus-no-climate-deal-at-copenhagen/" title="Consensus: No Climate Deal at Copenhagen"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=27325&amp;w=180" width="180" height="123" alt="Consensus: No Climate Deal at Copenhagen" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The decision by some world leaders to not seek a binding climate change agreement in Copenhagen has dealt a significant setback to efforts leading up to December&#8217;s meeting, reports the Wall Street Journal.
Instead, Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen has proposed to Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders a politically binding agreement that would commit to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/consensus-no-climate-deal-at-copenhagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
