<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Leader &#187; Pricing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/pricing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com</link>
	<description>The Executive's Daily Green Briefing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:16:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom:link rel="next" href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/pricing/feed/?page=2" />

		<item>
		<title>National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deepwater Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/" title="National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/wind_on_the_water1.9djk9lchi3ok8ggs08cg0o0ss.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="120" alt="National Grid Again Rejects High Costs of Offshore Wind" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>National Grid for the second time has turned down a proposal from a Rhode Island offshore wind developer that wants to sell the electricity retailer energy from a yet-to-be-developed wind farm.
National Grid says the price to purchase renewable energy from New Jersey-based Deepwater Wind is too high, reports the Providence Journal. Deepwater is seeking to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/20/national-grid-again-rejects-high-costs-of-offshore-wind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lower Renewable Energy Benchmark May Discourage Production</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/lower-renewable-energy-benchmark-may-discourage-production/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/lower-renewable-energy-benchmark-may-discourage-production/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 07:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=27301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/lower-renewable-energy-benchmark-may-discourage-production/" title="Lower Renewable Energy Benchmark May Discourage Production"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=27301&amp;w=180" width="180" height="126" alt="Lower Renewable Energy Benchmark May Discourage Production" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>As more utilities begin offering customers the ability to purchase electricity generated from renewable sources, other utilities may benefit from a drop in the benchmark price that they must pay independent producers for renewable energy.
The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has proposed a 15 percent cut in the benchmark that utilities must pay over a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/16/lower-renewable-energy-benchmark-may-discourage-production/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/04/u-s-cap-and-trade-creates-winners-and-losers-among-largest-emitters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/04/u-s-cap-and-trade-creates-winners-and-losers-among-largest-emitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Finance & Offsets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Offsets/RECs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cap-And-Trade System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ConocoPhillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDISON]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity Rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exelon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstEnergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Gas and Electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PointCarbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Dutch Shell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=26706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/04/u-s-cap-and-trade-creates-winners-and-losers-among-largest-emitters/" title="U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=26706&amp;w=180" width="180" height="126" alt="U.S. Cap-and-Trade Creates Winners and Losers among Largest Emitters" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Under the Kerry-Boxer cap-and-trade bill, ExxonMobil would face an annual charge of $5.9 billion to purchase carbon allowances, while electricity giants like Exelon and Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&#38;E) would emerge as financial winners, because they rely heavily on diversified, low-emission fleets, according to a new study from PointCarbon, reports the New York Times&#8217; Green [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/11/04/u-s-cap-and-trade-creates-winners-and-losers-among-largest-emitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost of Installed Solar Fell 30% in Past Decade</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/30/cost-of-installed-solar-fell-30-in-past-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/30/cost-of-installed-solar-fell-30-in-past-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installed solar cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawrence Berkeley National Lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar cost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=26487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/30/cost-of-installed-solar-fell-30-in-past-decade/" title="Cost of Installed Solar Fell 30% in Past Decade"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=26487&amp;w=180" width="180" height="84" alt="Cost of Installed Solar Fell 30% in Past Decade" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The cost to install solar has dropped 30 percent over the past 10 years, according to the Department of Energy&#8217;s Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
Most significantly, the cost of PV modules dropped from 2007 to 2008 after three years of remaining relatively flat, according to a new report from the lab, &#8220;Tracking the Sun II: The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/30/cost-of-installed-solar-fell-30-in-past-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tariff on Solar Imports May be Challenged</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/02/tariff-on-solar-imports-challenged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/02/tariff-on-solar-imports-challenged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance & Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=21990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/02/tariff-on-solar-imports-challenged/" title="Tariff on Solar Imports May be Challenged"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=21990&amp;w=180" width="180" height="124" alt="Tariff on Solar Imports May be Challenged" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>A recent decision to impose tariffs on a type of Chinese solar panels could eventually extend to other such imports, raising the cost of installing solar in the U.S.
The solar industry hopes to reverse the 2.5 percent tariff, reports Reuters.
The Solar Energy Industries Association, which has both U.S. and foreign membership, said it is taking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/10/02/tariff-on-solar-imports-challenged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utilities Bumping Rates to Cover Rising Costs, Smart Meters</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/utilities-to-raise-rates-to-cover-rising-costs-smart-meters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/utilities-to-raise-rates-to-cover-rising-costs-smart-meters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products & Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advanced Meters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Platte River Power Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Meters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utility Rate Hikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WE Energies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xcel Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=21823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/utilities-to-raise-rates-to-cover-rising-costs-smart-meters/" title="Utilities Bumping Rates to Cover Rising Costs, Smart Meters"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=21823&amp;w=180" width="180" height="125" alt="Utilities Bumping Rates to Cover Rising Costs, Smart Meters" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>While the cities of Fort Collins, Colo., and Milwaukee, Wis., are still debating proposed price hikes by local utilities, in some cases to pay for the installation of new technologies such as advanced metering, Xcel Energy in Minneapolis has received approval to raise prices in order to pay for rising costs of power distribution.
Despite opposition [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/30/utilities-to-raise-rates-to-cover-rising-costs-smart-meters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GHG Allowances Fall 32% to $2.19 in RGGI Auction</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/10/ghg-allowances-fall-32-to-2-19-in-rggi-auction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/10/ghg-allowances-fall-32-to-2-19-in-rggi-auction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Offsets/RECs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allowances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GHG auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RGGI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=21000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/10/ghg-allowances-fall-32-to-2-19-in-rggi-auction/" title="GHG Allowances Fall 32% to $2.19 in RGGI Auction"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=21000&amp;w=180" width="180" height="120" alt="GHG Allowances Fall 32% to $2.19 in RGGI Auction" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The poor economy and a decrease in manufacturing activity led to a precipitous decline in greenhouse gas emissions allowances in the most recent Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative auction.
The September auction resulted in pricing of $2.19 per ton for 2009 GHG emissions allowances, and $1.87 for 2012 allowances, according to RGGI.
That&#8217;s down more than 32 percent [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/10/ghg-allowances-fall-32-to-2-19-in-rggi-auction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP&#8217;s Account of Falling Electricity Prices Misleading</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/04/aps-account-of-falling-electricity-prices-misleading/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/04/aps-account-of-falling-electricity-prices-misleading/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance & Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Information Administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=20769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/04/aps-account-of-falling-electricity-prices-misleading/" title="AP&#8217;s Account of Falling Electricity Prices Misleading"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=20769&amp;w=180" width="180" height="55" alt="AP&#8217;s Account of Falling Electricity Prices Misleading" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a> Contrary to a popular Associated Press story, electricity prices are not trending downward as a whole, at least compared to prices before the typical summer price spike.
An AP story, &#8220;Demand for Electricity Sputters and Bills May Fall,&#8221; was widely circulated over the Labor Day weekend. The article noted how electricity prices were expected to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/04/aps-account-of-falling-electricity-prices-misleading/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citing Cost, Firms De-emphasize Energy Efficiency in IT Purchases</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/citing-cost-firms-de-emphasize-energy-efficiency-in-it-purchases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/citing-cost-firms-de-emphasize-energy-efficiency-in-it-purchases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hi-Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Energy Efficient IT Report (]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT purchase decisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=20553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/citing-cost-firms-de-emphasize-energy-efficiency-in-it-purchases/" title="Citing Cost, Firms De-emphasize Energy Efficiency in IT Purchases"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=20553&amp;w=180" width="180" height="155" alt="Citing Cost, Firms De-emphasize Energy Efficiency in IT Purchases" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Focusing on short-term cost reductions, companies increasingly are overlooking the promise of long-term savings that come with more expensive but more energy efficient computer equipment.
Instead, firms are emphasizing lower cost as a means of realizing short-term benefits to the bottom line, according to the 2009 Energy Efficient IT Report (PDF) from CDW.
After cost, reliability and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/citing-cost-firms-de-emphasize-energy-efficiency-in-it-purchases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facing Declining Demand, Water Bottlers Start Price War</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/facing-declining-demand-water-bottlers-start-price-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/facing-declining-demand-water-bottlers-start-price-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Carbon Footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance & Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food & Beverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper & Packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aqufina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Foot Forward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bottled water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coca-cola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dasani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Fina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Friendly Packaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pepsi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic bottles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=20504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/facing-declining-demand-water-bottlers-start-price-war/" title="Facing Declining Demand, Water Bottlers Start Price War"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=20504&amp;w=180" width="180" height="126" alt="Facing Declining Demand, Water Bottlers Start Price War" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Despite new strategies by bottled-water companies to offer more eco-friendly packaging, it hasn&#8217;t been enough to win back environmentally-minded customers. Bottled-water makers have stepped up a months-long price war to try to win back customers who now use tap water to reduce environmental waste and to save money, reports the Wall Street Journal. It could [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2009/09/01/facing-declining-demand-water-bottlers-start-price-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
