<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Environmental Management &#38; Energy News &#187; Spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com</link>
	<description>Environmental Leader</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:41:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<atom:link rel="next" href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/category/spending/feed/?page=2" />

		<item>
		<title>GM, Microsoft, Diageo Gave to Climate-Denier Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/02/16/gm-microsoft-diageo-gave-to-climate-denier-think-tank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/02/16/gm-microsoft-diageo-gave-to-climate-denier-think-tank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major Players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Altria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change denier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diageo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eli Lilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlaxoSmithKline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartland Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reynolds America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=70128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/02/16/gm-microsoft-diageo-gave-to-climate-denier-think-tank/" title="GM, Microsoft, Diageo Gave to Climate-Denier Think Tank"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=70128&amp;w=180" width="180" height="99" alt="GM, Microsoft, Diageo Gave to Climate-Denier Think Tank" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Microsoft, General Motors and Diageo are among the companies that have donated money to the Heartland Institute, a free-market think tank that denies the ongoing existence of global warming, according to the Guardian. The newspaper cites industry watchdog site DeSmogBlog, which says a think tank insider leaked it confidential documents detailing the Heartland Institute’s strategy [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/02/16/gm-microsoft-diageo-gave-to-climate-denier-think-tank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawyers Warn of Fuel Cell &#8216;Black Boxes&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/01/25/lawyers-warn-of-fuel-cell-black-boxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/01/25/lawyers-warn-of-fuel-cell-black-boxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Products & Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distributed Generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warranties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=68908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/01/25/lawyers-warn-of-fuel-cell-black-boxes/" title="Lawyers Warn of Fuel Cell &#8216;Black Boxes&#8217;"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/purecell1.dzme75vo9zscko8w8c4cwocw0.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="133" alt="Lawyers Warn of Fuel Cell &#8216;Black Boxes&#8217;" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>From the c-suite perspective, a $250,000 fuel cell is essentially a &#8220;black box&#8221; posing significant operational risk, two lawyers have warned in the latest issue of Executive Counsel. Roy Palk and Samuel Brumberg of LeClairRyan write that companies may turn their fuel cells on or off, but can&#8217;t open the box to make routine repairs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/01/25/lawyers-warn-of-fuel-cell-black-boxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Up to Half of Solar Costs are Administrative, DOE Says</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/12/12/up-to-half-of-solar-costs-are-administrative-doe-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/12/12/up-to-half-of-solar-costs-are-administrative-doe-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding & Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grid parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rooftop Solar Challenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunShot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=66592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/12/12/up-to-half-of-solar-costs-are-administrative-doe-says/" title="Up to Half of Solar Costs are Administrative, DOE Says"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=66592&amp;w=180" width="180" height="108" alt="Up to Half of Solar Costs are Administrative, DOE Says" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Between 40 and 50 percent of the cost of ownership and operation for a rooftop solar system is contributed by administrative costs such as permitting, financing and connecting to the grid, according to the Department of Energy (via the New York Times). Ramamoorthy Ramesh, the manager of the DOE’s SunShot program and a materials scientist [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/12/12/up-to-half-of-solar-costs-are-administrative-doe-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewables Briefing: Bernard Matthews, China Solar Leap, Biggest Wind-Hydro Plant</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/renewables-briefing-bernard-matthews-china-solar-leap-biggest-wind-hydro-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/renewables-briefing-bernard-matthews-china-solar-leap-biggest-wind-hydro-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydroelectric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anerobic digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bernard Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=65132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/renewables-briefing-bernard-matthews-china-solar-leap-biggest-wind-hydro-plant/" title="Renewables Briefing: Bernard Matthews, China Solar Leap, Biggest Wind-Hydro Plant"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=65132&amp;w=180" width="180" height="131" alt="Renewables Briefing: Bernard Matthews, China Solar Leap, Biggest Wind-Hydro Plant" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Turkey company Bernard Matthews is planning a £4m ($6.4) anaerobic digester at its Holton factory in Suffolk, U.K.,  in a move that the company said would provide 13 percent of the site’s electricity needs, according to the BBC. The digester will use about 28,000 tons of liquid waste a year, the company said. China’s new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/renewables-briefing-bernard-matthews-china-solar-leap-biggest-wind-hydro-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: ANWR Drilling Push, Canada Reacts, EV Fire Probe</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/policy-enforcement-briefing-anwr-drilling-push-canada-reacts-ev-fire-probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/policy-enforcement-briefing-anwr-drilling-push-canada-reacts-ev-fire-probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic National Wildlife Refuge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chevrolet Volt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross-State Air Pollution Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DuPont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Kurdistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prime Minister Steven Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=65136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/policy-enforcement-briefing-anwr-drilling-push-canada-reacts-ev-fire-probe/" title="Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: ANWR Drilling Push, Canada Reacts, EV Fire Probe"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=65136&amp;w=180" width="180" height="141" alt="Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: ANWR Drilling Push, Canada Reacts, EV Fire Probe" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>A jobs-related proposal from House Republicans to support new infrastructure spending is dominating by a plan to massively expand offshore oil and gas leasing and open up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, The Hill reported. The proposal was announced days after President Obama unveiled a five-year offshore drilling plan that slow walks new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/14/policy-enforcement-briefing-anwr-drilling-push-canada-reacts-ev-fire-probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Identifying Hidden Energy and Sustainability Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/07/identifying-hidden-energy-and-sustainability-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/07/identifying-hidden-energy-and-sustainability-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webinar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=64758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/07/identifying-hidden-energy-and-sustainability-costs/" title="Identifying Hidden Energy and Sustainability Costs"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=64758&amp;w=180" width="180" height="149" alt="Identifying Hidden Energy and Sustainability Costs" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Join Environmental Leader for a webinar on Wednesday, November 16, 2011 at 10am PST/1pm EST, discussing hidden energy and sustainability costs. Learn first-hand how organizations are gaining comprehensive visibility of their overall energy spend with a single, enterprise-wide system of record. Register now to join Tom Harrington, senior program manager, workplace services at Intuit and Jason [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/11/07/identifying-hidden-energy-and-sustainability-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: Another EPA Rule Eased, Veto Threat, PA Shale Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/10/05/policy-enforcement-briefing-another-epa-rule-eased-veto-threat-pa-shale-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/10/05/policy-enforcement-briefing-another-epa-rule-eased-veto-threat-pa-shale-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 13:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biofuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ameren Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angela Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Green Fuel LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross-State Air Pollution Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Energy Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Research Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Corbett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=62983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/10/05/policy-enforcement-briefing-another-epa-rule-eased-veto-threat-pa-shale-fees/" title="Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: Another EPA Rule Eased, Veto Threat, PA Shale Fees"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=62983&amp;w=180" width="180" height="108" alt="Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: Another EPA Rule Eased, Veto Threat, PA Shale Fees" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The EPA will ease emissions restrictions on 27 states in its Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, the latest retreat for the agency under fire from industry and congressional Republicans, The Wall Street Journal reported.  The agency will propose a &#8220;technical adjustment&#8221; to the final rule, which will take effect in January, to allow power plants to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/10/05/policy-enforcement-briefing-another-epa-rule-eased-veto-threat-pa-shale-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackout May Have Caused Millions in Losses</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/12/blackout-may-have-caused-millions-in-losses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/12/blackout-may-have-caused-millions-in-losses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inland Empire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orange County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Diego]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=61600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/12/blackout-may-have-caused-millions-in-losses/" title="Blackout May Have Caused Millions in Losses"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=61600&amp;w=180" width="180" height="106" alt="Blackout May Have Caused Millions in Losses" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The blackout that cut off power to four million Californian and Mexican customers on Thursday has had wide-ranging effects on businesses, with up to $118 million in losses, according to news reports. A multi-agency investigation is being launched to determine the cause of the blackout, which affected  San Diego County, California’s Inland Empire and parts [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/12/blackout-may-have-caused-millions-in-losses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: EPA Lawsuits Pricetag, Climate Talks, Solar Grants</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/policy-enforcement-briefing-epa-lawsuits-pricetag-climate-talks-solar-grants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/policy-enforcement-briefing-epa-lawsuits-pricetag-climate-talks-solar-grants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding & Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste & Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christiana Figueres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earthquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entergy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazardous Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Construction Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solid Waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stormwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Group International]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=61139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/policy-enforcement-briefing-epa-lawsuits-pricetag-climate-talks-solar-grants/" title="Policy &#038; Enforcement Briefing: EPA Lawsuits Pricetag, Climate Talks, Solar Grants"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=61139&amp;w=180" width="180" height="173" alt="Policy &#038; Enforcement Briefing: EPA Lawsuits Pricetag, Climate Talks, Solar Grants" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The Department of Justice spent about $3.3 million annually between 1995 and 2010 to defend the EPA from lawsuits brought by industry, environmental and citizens groups, the Government Accountability Office stated in a report requested by Senate Republicans.  In addition, owing to statutory requirements to pay certain successful plaintiffs for attorney fees and costs, the Treasury [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/09/02/policy-enforcement-briefing-epa-lawsuits-pricetag-climate-talks-solar-grants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Renewables Briefing: Fresh &amp; Easy, Envision Solar, Nexamp, Magic Hat</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/26/renewables-briefing-fresh-easy-envision-solar-nexamp-magic-hat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/26/renewables-briefing-fresh-easy-envision-solar-nexamp-magic-hat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business-to-Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Research & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Envision Solar International Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic Hat Brewing Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SolarWorld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=60660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/26/renewables-briefing-fresh-easy-envision-solar-nexamp-magic-hat/" title="Renewables Briefing: Fresh &#038; Easy, Envision Solar, Nexamp, Magic Hat"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=60660&amp;w=180" width="180" height="127" alt="Renewables Briefing: Fresh &#038; Easy, Envision Solar, Nexamp, Magic Hat" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Fresh &#38; Easy Neighborhood Market and REC Solar, a provider of home and commercial solar electric systems, have unveiled 11 rooftop solar installations in Phoenix and Los Angeles. The systems will produce 746,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity a year to meet about 20 percent of the stores’ energy production needs. Boston-based Cathartes Private Investments is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/26/renewables-briefing-fresh-easy-envision-solar-nexamp-magic-hat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy &amp; Enforcement Briefing: Nuclear Fears, Strange Bedfellows, EPA Review</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/24/policy-enforcement-briefing-nuclear-fears-strange-bedfellows-epa-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/24/policy-enforcement-briefing-nuclear-fears-strange-bedfellows-epa-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conventional Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bureau of Indian Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental protection agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyoto Protocol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcellus Shale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Geological Survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=60474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/24/policy-enforcement-briefing-nuclear-fears-strange-bedfellows-epa-review/" title="Policy &#038; Enforcement Briefing: Nuclear Fears, Strange Bedfellows, EPA Review"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/uploads/yapb_cache/north_anna_nuclear_resize1.d46mexluc0g8gowc0wskwcsgo.a9sxxja1njksswcs400wcc4cg.th.jpeg" width="180" height="106" alt="Policy &#038; Enforcement Briefing: Nuclear Fears, Strange Bedfellows, EPA Review" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) completed a final version of its regulatory review plan on Tuesday to comply with President Barack Obama&#8217;s order that agency rules not overly burden business, The Hill reported. The EPA said it will review 35 regulations under the final plan with an eye toward &#8220;modifying, streamlining, expanding or repealing a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/08/24/policy-enforcement-briefing-nuclear-fears-strange-bedfellows-epa-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Data, Financing Hold Back Energy Efficiency, Report Says</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/25/poor-data-financing-hold-back-energy-efficiency-report-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/25/poor-data-financing-hold-back-energy-efficiency-report-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 20:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contracts & Installations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance & Reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding & Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Defense Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=58658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/25/poor-data-financing-hold-back-energy-efficiency-report-says/" title="Poor Data, Financing Hold Back Energy Efficiency, Report Says"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=58658&amp;w=180" width="180" height="95" alt="Poor Data, Financing Hold Back Energy Efficiency, Report Says" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Poor project aggregation and a lack of data standardization are among the factors keeping the energy efficiency marketplace from fulfilling its potential, according to a report by the Environmental Defense Fund. The report, Show Me the Money: Energy Efficiency Barriers and Opportunities (pdf), said that although investors stand to gain about $130 billion in annual [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/07/25/poor-data-financing-hold-back-energy-efficiency-report-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy &amp; Regulatory Briefing: Renewable Funds, EPA Review, Belo Monte Dam</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/06/03/policy-regulatory-briefing-renewable-funds-epa-review-belo-monte-dam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/06/03/policy-regulatory-briefing-renewable-funds-epa-review-belo-monte-dam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policy & Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Briefings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil & Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belo Monte dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regultory review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subcommittee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=55574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/06/03/policy-regulatory-briefing-renewable-funds-epa-review-belo-monte-dam/" title="Policy &#038; Regulatory Briefing: Renewable Funds, EPA Review, Belo Monte Dam"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=55574&amp;w=180" width="180" height="111" alt="Policy &#038; Regulatory Briefing: Renewable Funds, EPA Review, Belo Monte Dam" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>The House appropriations subcommittee on energy and water yesterday passed a bill that cuts renewable energy funding by 27 percent to $1.3 billion, or $1.9 billion below what Obama sought in his budget, the Hill reports. The panel’s bill cuts $97 million for solar power, $46 million for fuel-efficient vehicle technologies and $200 million for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/06/03/policy-regulatory-briefing-renewable-funds-epa-review-belo-monte-dam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burt&#8217;s Bees, Marks &amp; Spencer Share Staff Engagement Tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/31/burts-bees-marks-spencer-share-staff-engagement-tactics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/31/burts-bees-marks-spencer-share-staff-engagement-tactics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Beauty Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retail & Restaurants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Strategy & Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burt's Bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marks & Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[staff initiatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=55353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/31/burts-bees-marks-spencer-share-staff-engagement-tactics/" title="Burt&#8217;s Bees, Marks &#038; Spencer Share Staff Engagement Tactics"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=55353&amp;w=180" width="180" height="146" alt="Burt&#8217;s Bees, Marks &#038; Spencer Share Staff Engagement Tactics" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Burt’s Bees sees engaging its employees as the most critical and challenging of all its sustainability targets for 2020, the Guardian has reported. The cosmetics company was a runner-up in Guardian Sustainable Business’s Engaging Employee awards. The company aims to achieve 100 percent employee engagement in sustainability by 2020. In the same year it aims [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/31/burts-bees-marks-spencer-share-staff-engagement-tactics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Grid Benefits &#8216;Could Top $2 Trillion&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/26/smart-grid-benefits-could-top-2-trillion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/26/smart-grid-benefits-could-top-2-trillion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 16:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Leader</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Research & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Grid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.environmentalleader.com/?p=54627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/26/smart-grid-benefits-could-top-2-trillion/" title="Smart Grid Benefits &#8216;Could Top $2 Trillion&#8217;"><img src="http://www.environmentalleader.com/wp-content/plugins/yet-another-photoblog/YapbThumbnailer.php?post_id=54627&amp;w=180" width="180" height="206" alt="Smart Grid Benefits &#8216;Could Top $2 Trillion&#8217;" style="float:left;padding:0 10px 10px 0;" ></a>Smart grid technologies could deliver between $1.3 trillion and $2 trillion in benefits over the next 20 years, according to a study by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), reported in the New York Times. The study projects the cost of installing digital controls and applications on the grid at $17 billion to $24 billion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.environmentalleader.com/2011/05/26/smart-grid-benefits-could-top-2-trillion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

