If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Toyota’s ‘Green Halo’ Challenged

During the past two weeks, about 8,300 Natural Resources Defense Council activists sent e-mails and faxes to Toyota, maker of the Prius, urging the company to support a Senate energy bill that would set a 35-mile-per-gallon requirement by 2020, Business Week reports.The Union of Concerned Scientists and the National Environmental Trust, are mobilizing to challenge Toyota for supporting a more modest approach on CAFE standards that would require 32 to 35 mpg by 2022.

“They have a green halo, justifiably, and yet unbeknownst to their customers they’ve joined forces with the Detroit Three to argue against greener standards,” said Deron Lovaas, the NRDC’s vehicles campaign director, in the article.

Toyota says that the alternative bill still would raise the standards up to 40 percent and give automakers more time to meet the goals. The company said it would respond to the messages it receives.

In the New York Times, columnist Tom Friedman wrote (via NRDC’s blog), “‘Toyota, which pioneered the industry-leading, 50-miles-per-gallon Prius hybrid, has joined with the Big Three U.S. automakers in lobbying against the tougher mileage standards in the Senate version of the draft energy bill. Now why would Toyota, which has used the Prius to brand itself as the greenest car company, pull such a stunt? Is it because Toyota wants to slow down innovation in Detroit on more energy efficient vehicles, which Toyota already dominates, while also keeping mileage room to build giant pickup trucks, like the Toyota Tundra, at the gas-guzzler end of the U.S. market?”

Here’s the text of the message NRDC’ activists have sent to Shigeru Hayakawa, Toyota President and CEO:

I am very disappointed to learn about Toyota’s opposition to a sensible increase in fuel economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. If your company is serious about fighting America’s addiction to oil, it’s time for your lobbying to match your advertising rhetoric.

Toyota’s advertisements paint the company as the greenest, most fuel-efficient car company on the market. If that’s the case, why is Toyota an active member of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a Washington lobbying group that claims that a sensible 35 mile per gallon standard is “unattainable”?

Americans who love the Prius thought that Toyota was a leader in the field. But, based on your lobbying activities, you’re no different from all of the other auto companies.

As a consumer, I urge you to call for a 35 mile per gallon standard by 2020 that allows for continuous improvement after 2020. I further urge you to withdraw Toyota from any lobbying association that opposes a 35 mpg standard.

Toyota sold a record 16,062 Priuses in July – a 50 percent increase versus the month last year.

Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Operationalizing EHS Management: Bridge the Gap from Strategy to Execution
Sponsored By: LNS Research

  
EHS Special Report
Sponsored By: Environmental Leader

  

3 thoughts on “Toyota’s ‘Green Halo’ Challenged

  1. Recently there have been reports about Toyota going Eco friendly. This attitude of Toyota shows that they have only tried to reduce the cost of their product by efficent means and are only trying to hoodwink their customers by trying to show they are eco friendly.

  2. Well, I think that Washington is really trying to hoodwink us into thinking these high CAFE standards are really going to have any progressive environmental change. There was an interesting article in yesterday’s Financial Times titled “Posturing will not save the planet” that talk about how little effect they would have – they don’t effect consumer habits, they don’t effect cars already on the road, and cars actually only make up 20% of emissions to begin with. I do some work with the AAM, and Americans want to buy trucks more than SUVs. If there’s no consumer demand for smaller, more fuel efficient cars this legislation doesn’t make sense. AutoChoice.org has some good info on current consumer demand right now.

  3. Will, you make a valid point. This legislation cannot effect the cars that are already on the road. However, better fuel economy for future cars does not necessarily entail a smaller car, it means a better made car. A car that uses lighter, stronger materials, and is more efficient when it comes to gas-using features such as A/C and heating.

    Though Toyota’s lobbyist are having a negative effect on the bill, the concerned public can have a positive one. I am working for a coalition that is trying to keep the CAFE standards at their current level. Everyone can help pass this important bill by going to http://www.energybill2007.org and petitioning their representatives.

Leave a Comment