If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Whole Foods, Bed Bath & Beyond to Cut Suppliers Sourcing Fuel from Oil Sands

AlbertaOilSandsTo cut their carbon footprints, retailers Whole Foods Market and Bed Bath & Beyond are dropping suppliers that source fuel from Canada’s oil sands (also known as the Alberta Tar Sands), reports the Financial Times. While Whole Foods Market has switched to suppliers sourcing U.S. crude oil, Bed Bath & Beyond instituted a new policy that encourages its transportation providers to avoid high impact fuels including those from refineries using Tar Sands.

The decisions are not expected to impede the flow of Alberta oil to the U.S., which represents a fifth of all U.S. energy imports, but it does send a signal against synthetic crude oil from Alberta, reports the Toronto Star.

Both companies are responding to ForestEthics’ campaign launched last year to urge U.S. corporate companies away from oil sands fuel, which has a higher carbon content than conventional crude oil, reports the Financial Times. ForestEthics is negotiating with more than 30 companies to adopt similar policies, according to the article.

The oil sands represent the largest oil reserve outside Saudi Arabia and reduce Washington’s dependence on Middle Eastern fuel, reports the Financial Times.

The Obama administration approved a pipeline in August to carry oil sands fuel into the U.S., reports Financial Times. In addition, a low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) provision was removed from the House climate bill passed in June last year.

Whole Foods replaced supplier Marathon Oil, which sources fuel from the oil sands, with CountryMark, which uses only American crude, reports Financial Times.

However, Whole Foods officials told the Toronto Star the company will continue to use fuels derived from Alberta tar sands in the Rocky Mountain region because there is no alternative source. The company could reverse the policy if Alberta succeeds in the testing of carbon capture and storage technology to reduce carbon emissions in its tar sands production, according to the article.

Last May, Canada slated about approximately $132.0 million under its Clean Energy Fund for research initiatives, which include new technologies to address environmental challenges in the oil sands.

Whole Foods says only fuels derived from U.S.-based crude oil are being use in the supply chains at 10 of the food retailer’s 11 North American distribution centers, reports CBC News.

Bed Bath & Beyond says it is using Tar Sands as an issue in its bidding process for selecting transportation providers, according to a press release. This is expected to give providers an edge that can demonstrate their commitment to fuels with lower carbon emissions and lower environmental and social impacts.

Critics are suggesting that the move by the companies is “greenwashing,” reports The Globe and Mail. According to the article, Whole Foods, even with its new policy, may still use more of the Alberta oil, percentage wise, than the rest of the U.S. economy, according to the article.

Alan Knight, a U.K.-based sustainable development consultant who worked with Virgin Airlines when it considered dropping the use oil-sands-derived jet fuel, told The Globe and Mail “it’s difficult to see the boycott as much more than a publicity stunt.”

Knight also said in the article that boycotting is easier, cheaper and good PR but it won’t solve the problem.

On the investor side, British investor activist group FairPensions filed a resolution with BP PLC demanding more information about the risks associated with the company’s oil sands activities, reports CBC News. Investors say they are concerned about the cost of carbon capture and storage and the cost of expected emissions, according to the article.

CBC News also reports that Shell has shelved plans to expand its $14-billion Athabasca Oilsands Project from 255,000 to 700,000 barrels per day next year.

Environmental Leader Product and Project Awards 2017
Sponsored By: Environmental Leader

  
Just the Facts: 8 Popular Misconceptions about LEDs & Controls
Sponsored By: Digital Lumens

  
Video: Expense & Data Management for Complex Payables
Sponsored By: Ecova, Inc.

  
Financing Environmental Resiliency and a Low-Carbon Future with Green Bonds
Sponsored By: NSF International

  

7 thoughts on “Whole Foods, Bed Bath & Beyond to Cut Suppliers Sourcing Fuel from Oil Sands

  1. Bed Bath & Beyond refuted this claim. It’s certain that they will soon be filing for bankruptcy should they follow in this line. By the way, maybe they should stop using electricity in their stores, which comes predominantly from coal. IDIOTS!!!

  2. Mental note: two companies not to shop at any more: Whole Foods, and Bed Bath & Beyond. Maybe next time they can try to do something that will actually help, rather than just PR stunts.

  3. Just another prime example how environmental groups will distort the facts to try to get their points across. Maybe if you so called knowledgable peole did a little research and verified your facts you may have some creditability. What a bunch of losers, I guess the only bigger losers are the morons who donate money to you. What a sad group, start doing some research and get you facts straight. Be responsible is that too much to ask?

  4. Whole Foods, The Gap, Levi, and Bath and Beyond are hipicrits. Alberta oil sands produces less than 1% of Canadas greenhouse gasses and Canada produces less than 2% of the worlds greenhouse gasses, whereas the US and and China contribute more than 40% of the worlds eco damage as a result of coal power plants. You are suggesting America should purchase their oil from countries that hate you. Good luck. I for one will no longer shop or purchase products from this group of companies, and I will urge Canadians to boycott The Gap, Bed and Beyond, Levi, and Whole Foods. It is America that is poisoning the environment, not Alberta. Tom…Hamilton

Leave a Comment