If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Emissions Reductions is Top Environmental Concern for U.S. Businesses

The top concern of U.S. businesses for climate change and environmental issues is reducing carbon emissions, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Appetite for Change global survey.

U.S. survey respondents ranked reduction of carbon-dioxide emissions as the issue to most impact their companies over the next two to five years (16 percent), followed by new regulation, (13 percent), energy efficiency (12 percent), and legislation/new laws (11 percent).

“The Obama Administration recently announced that the federal government would reduce its own carbon footprint by 28 percent by 2020. If the government were to push down that requirement through its supply chain to all government contractors and suppliers, the impact on U.S. business would be quite significant,” says Kathy Nieland, leader of the Sustainability and Climate Change practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Eighty-seven percent of U.S. survey respondents say change is likely over the next few years as a result of the climate change and environmental debate. Twenty-eight percent believe these changes could be significant.

Although more than half the respondents (55 percent) noted that the climate change and environmental debate has had an impact on the way their organization conducts business 45 percent said it has had little if no impact at all.

The survey also finds that there is broad-based support for tax incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency. Eighty-eight percent of American companies surveyed said that tax incentives were effective in encouraging businesses to reduce their environmental impact, although 67 percent said that tax incentives currently in place are not sufficiently motivating them to change their business behavior to obtain them.

One in four U.S. respondents (23 percent) said government should have primary responsibility for leading behavioral change around climate initiatives, rather than businesses overall or their own industry. In comparison, 44 percent of respondents globally said government should have primary responsibility in this area.

A significantly higher proportion of U.S. respondents (38 percent) want business/the market to have primary responsibility for leading behavioral change, compared with only 18 percent globally.

A majority (56 percent) of U.S. respondents do not feel that government engages effectively with business to ensure its environmental policies take industry views into account. Only 17 percent said they believe the government has a clear, unambiguous policy with regard to environmental economic instruments.

Another finding shows that U.S. businesses are split on whether voluntary programs to disclose their carbon emissions results in a reduction of their environmental impact. Fifty percent said they are not very/not at all effective, while the remaining 50 percent say they are effective.

More than four in 10 (44 percent) of respondents said the potential cost savings from introducing energy-efficient measures was “very influential” on their organization’s environmental behavior.

A recent study from Ceres and the Professional Risk Managers International Association (PRMIA) indicates that nearly 75 percent of corporate risk managers said political and regulatory environments are their top concerns.

Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  
Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  
Right On Time
Sponsored By: Gensuite

  
Planning for a Sustainable Future
Sponsored By: Dakota Software

  

3 thoughts on “Emissions Reductions is Top Environmental Concern for U.S. Businesses

  1. If the Obama Administration would increase truck gross vehicle weight to 105,000 lbs, we could reduce truck fuel consumption (and associated CO2 emissions) nearly 20 percent. A focus on upgrading the deficient bridges across the country could make this implementable.

  2. The previous person makes a fair comment – but – this addresses symptoms (transport) rather than causes (the need to transport). A debate is starting in Europe which looks at transport not just in terms of “make it more efficient” but also in terms of the need to transport.

  3. If BD 0908 chemisty was used in the trucking industry, in their drive trains they would reduce emissions and make a profit by using it. This nano technology was first developed by the D.O.E. at Argonne Labs. BD 0908 is the next generation and it is not petroleum based and is an unexhaustable mineral. But the Obama administration does not know about this technology that tax payer dollars funded. It works I use it. May be the president might want to cut his emissions by using it.

Leave a Comment