If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

E&Y: Enterprise Climate Change Spending On Rise

Global executives believe that the climate change agenda will significantly impact business performance and strategy over the next few years, according to a new survey by Ernst & Young: Action amid uncertainty: the business response to climate change. Three hundred global corporate executives from 16 countries with at least $1b in annual revenue participated in the survey conducted during spring 2010.

The report highlighted several trends among executives. Over 90 percent of those interviewed said that climate change governance was an issue that required leadership from C-level executives. Fifty-five percent of respondents said their organization has a board member or C-level executive as the head of their climate change strategy.

Two-thirds of respondents have launched an enterprise-wide climate change program and a further 16% expect to do so in the next two years, according to the report. Almost 40 percent consider their organizations to be climate change leaders in their industry, while only 15 percent described their strategy as limited to achieving compliance with regulations.

Ninety-two percent identified energy costs as a leading driver in the next year. Perhaps as a result of this, investing in energy efficiency was the top climate change initiative senior executives plan to undertake in the next 12 months. Almost half said they will invest 0.5% to 5% of their revenue on climate change initiatives. Changing consumer demand was also cited as a major factor in climate change initiatives, particularly in the automotive, consumer products and technology sectors, as was the cost of carbon.

The use of new technology is expected to revolutionize some industries and provide direct opportunities to reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.

“As a communications company, we need to take energy conservation as a responsibility and a challenge. This will require us to develop new, green technology to satisfy the demands of society. We can use green technology in our video communications business,” according to one participant.

Increasingly, equity analysts and institutional investors are taking a hard look at climate change as a strategic business issue. Forty-three percent of responders said analysts covering their companies have already started factoring climate change considerations into their valuation models.

Meanwhile, investor organizations from the U.S., U.K. and Australia joined forces to develop new climate disclosure guidelines for the oil and gas sector, calling on oil and gas companies to strengthen their reporting on climate change and sustainability risks and opportunities, as well as any impact from evolving regulation.

The Copenhagen climate conference appeared to have little effect on most responders. Two thirds said they would continue with their current strategies, while 31 percent said they would increase investments in climate initiatives as a result of the conference. However, 70 percent of Chinese companies participating in the survey said they would increase their investments in climate change initiatives.

While survey participants said they have a strong desire to see regulatory uncertainties disappear, most are not waiting on governments to decide on new rules before implementing their own initiatives.

Six Steps to Navigating EHS & Compliance
Sponsored By: UL EHS Sustainability

  
Planning for a Sustainable Future
Sponsored By: Dakota Software

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  

3 thoughts on “E&Y: Enterprise Climate Change Spending On Rise

  1. I’m glad to see this level of discussion in regard to climate change, but until we are on a track to meet near term emission goals, i will be promoting more action and less discussion. One reason I see for the imbalance between action and discussion is because the “climate message” has not been developed to a point where its clarity motivates action. In this article the “message” deficiency I see is associating the work “uncertainty” with “climate change”. Most people drive to work each day, even though they’re “uncertain” that they’ll arrive safely. Of course, safe arrival is a very high probability. Climate change has about the same amount of uncertainty. Look at this month’s “National Geographic”, if you need to be reminded that this is very real. True, we don’t know the specifics, but I believe it’s misleading to cast climate change as anything else but “arriving soon”.

  2. I think the article refers to ‘regulatory’ uncertainty, not climate uncertainty. Unless the US government gets off its ineffective duff and passes climate regulation, that regulatory uncertainty is indeed a reality. And if the regulation is indeed too mild to have an effect on climate (as the current Kerry Lieberman bill is expected to be), then we are in a world of hurt as conservative businesses who will really only invest up to the level of expected regulation (which, despite what CEOs think they are doing, is actually the majority) turn to those guidelines as the indicators of how much caution they should bother with.

    In my experience there is a major gap between what CEOs say they will do and what companies actually do.

  3. I agree that the current bill is likely too mild. But, it will have a non-zero effect on climate, and the effect will be in the right direction.

    And that’s about the best that the US government can be expected to deliver. A few tiny steps at a time is breakneck speed in a Washington that is chock-full of special interest group lobbyists seeking to delay, baby, delay.

    But a few timy steps are better than none. I hope everyone calls their Senators to tell them to support this bill. That’s basically the only way to counteract some of that big-money lobbying that’s going on.

    And then next year, or the year after that, we can come back to the table to try and get a few more baby steps accomplished. That approach is our only real option to doing nothing.

    Time will tell if that approach will be fast enough. But it’s better than doing nothing.

    Please, call your Senators. Really. NOW. While you’re thinking about it.

Leave a Comment