If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Custom, Green and Factory Built Homes

To suggest that prefab homes are green simply because they reduce waste is like saying insulation is a great way to reduce noise – it’s only the proverbial tip of the iceberg!  A primary indication of this fact is that both USGBC and NAHB award copious points in their respective green guidelines if a house is factory built.  What do these two dominant green rating systems see in prefab?

Material Conservation

History has well established that a factory environment is ideal for minimizing waste of all sorts.  Not only do modern computer programs optimize cutting and assembly schedules, but the minimized waste that remains is easily recycled because it is concentrated in one location.  And since it never sees weather, little is lost to culling.

Additionally, because manufactured buildings are marketed in many states, they must be highly engineered to meet a range of codes.  This means engineered wood becomes a favored specification.  Not only are these products well documented and highly recyclable, but they are fabricated almost exclusively from fast growth, plantation trees.  This reduces logging pressures on old growth forests even as it cuts down on shipping.

In contrast, on-site construction typically fills local landfills with a generous stream of scraps, cut-offs and other building waste.

Energy Conservation

Energy savings occur initially during the manufacturing process and then, if the homes are properly designed, the savings will continue and increase for the life of the home.  Since tight, well insulated homes are much easier to manufacture than to site build, demographers are seeing green homebuilders adopt this approach in record numbers.

Factory workers typically live within 5-15 miles of their facility which contrasts well with the longer commutes most traditional builders face; energy is saved.  By concentrating all material deliveries to centralized locations with storage capacity, the amount of back-and-forth delivery to construction sites is dramatically reduced; energy is saved. Because a prefabricated house is closed to the weather within a few days, the amount of construction site heating is greatly reduced.  And again, energy is saved.

With computer accuracy and assembly-line reliability, the manufactured house is generally tighter than a site built structure.  Because the materials never sit in the weather, there is less warping which means a tighter end product.  Better blower-door tests mean less energy usage for the life of the building.

Site Preservation

A traditional building sequence assumes massive site degradation during construction and then comprehensive remediation at the end.  Anywhere from two to ten trucks will arrive daily, some of which are very heavy – concrete mixers, well drillers, cranes, and material deliveries.  The ruts and concomitant erosion stemming from this traffic is largely eliminated at a factory where materials arrive at loading docks and the crew park in parking lots (not always the greenest lots, it must be said).

In addition to the erosion and habitat degradation, traditional sites are frequently despoiled by significant toxic spills, from leaking engines to spilled solvents.  All of this is minimized in factories which must operate under health and safety laws.

The transports and cranes that deliver and place the prefabricated units are only on site for a day or two.  Beyond minimizing physical damage, their brief stay means fewer disturbances to neighbors and community as well.

Health Quality Standards

Both builders and occupants enjoy better health standards when using factory based delivery.  OSHA and similar worker safety ordinances publish and enforce standards for particulate matter as well as VOCs in factory atmosphere.  On a traditional site, however, air and water quality is almost impossible to control and the introduction of dangerous materials is not uncommon.  Besides the mold sown by using wet lumber, there are a host of other vectors for bad air and water. The recent use of corrosive gypsum board from China is only the latest to make headlines.

Life Cycle Costing (Durability)

Finally, a prefabricated house is usually more durable than a site built equivalent.  A longer life means the embodied energy and carbon footprint are spread over the longest possible duty cycle.

Most everything that goes into a factory built house has a warrantee which is either passed onto the buyer or extended by the manufacturer.  In contrast, a typical site built home is rarely guaranteed for more than a year.

And because fabricators typically sell in many states, they usually build to the highest standard in their region.  It makes no financial sense to build different products for different states.  As with any manufacturer, they are legally bound by their sales contract to meet or exceed all applicable codes, ordinances and laws.

Certainly there are green gradations in factory built homes with some being state of the art and others barely better than their site built siblings.   But for an industry renowned for inertia, it is gratifying to see how quickly most manufacturers are greening their lines.

John Connell serves as Design Director at Connor Homes, a company specializing in the design and manufacture of early American-style homes, in a process Connor Homes refers to as ‘mill-built architecture’; allowing for the best of historical early American architecture, design aesthetic and details, coupled with the aforementioned benefits of factory built. Connell is the Founder of the Yestermorrow Design/Build School in Warren, Vermont,  and author of Homing Instinct (McGraw Hill) and The Inspired House (Taunton) and Principal of 2morrow Studio.

John Connell
John Connell is the Founder of Connor Homes, author of Homing Instinct (McGraw Hill) and The Inspired House (Taunton) and Principal of 2morrow Studio.
 
Packaging LED & Advanced Rooftop Unit Control (ARC) Retrofits for Maximum Performance
Sponsored By: Transformative Wave

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  
Financing Environmental Resiliency and a Low-Carbon Future with Green Bonds
Sponsored By: NSF International

  

3 thoughts on “Custom, Green and Factory Built Homes

  1. John, thank you for summarizing the advantages that factor built homes have over site built houses. As the son of an architect, I visited many building sites when was younger and even then it was clear to me that putting up a new building first involved clearing much more land than the building would eventually occupy. It is exciting to learn that factory built homes can minimize site destruction as well decrease the energy used to build the structure and the amount of energy it will consume over its extended lifetime. Is it feasible for commercial buildings to be made in factories?

  2. Matt,
    Thanks for your thoughts. Yes indeed, commercial construction has long made use of prefabrication to control and shorten their assembly schedules. They tend to need much more customization in their prefab components, as you would expect. Happily, I see the residential manufacturers learning more from them every day.
    Better times!
    John Connell

  3. Wow, John, what an excellent and thorough summation of the many and varying areas of advantage in prefab structures. Additionally, a clever modular design with a wide array of compatible components and finishes inside and out could achieve the illusion – indeed the reality with owner participation in design – of a custom built home at each site, with unique features differentiating even a wide swath of tract homes from each other.

    I’ve long been an interested observer of architecture, and I’ve noted the increasing use of shipping containers as building modules in recent years. For that reason among many others, I think the market is ripe for your kind of thinking – and you justify the shift beautifully from several angles.

    In my estimation, we’ve got zero time left to make our society and infrastructure smarter and more efficient. Factors like national independence, global competitiveness, and the steadily climbing cost of dwindling natural resources like lumber and fuel will coalesce to force to the forefront many more intelligent-by-design techniques like you describe – not only in construction but in many other facets of human endeavor.

    I also see great opportunities in building a variety of green options directly into the designs with things like natural lighting, passive (and active) solar, and convection cooling from basement spaces.

    Matt Courtland brings up a nice question about scaling to commercial applications, to which you’ve responded effectively. I’m curious to know if there are any ballpark percentages you can share with regard to cost savings sufficient to contribute substantially both to higher margin to the developer and lower price point for the buyer, while simultaneously achieving greater quality and durability in the finished product along with all the many other benefits you’ve described.

    Craig Shields
    Editor
    2Greenenergy.com

Leave a Comment