If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Lobbyists Pull Out Checkbooks to Overturn CA Emission Law

Tesoro Corp. and Valero Energy Corp., both of San Antonio, Tx., have spent a combined $1.5 million or 79 percent of the funds collected in an effort to overturn California’s AB 32, which seeks to reduce the state’s greenhouse gas emissions by 15 percent by 2020, and which would begin to go into effect in 2012. That would bring carbon emissions in the state down to levels not seen since 1990.

This may be only the beginning of a massive spending campaign by companies which have little or no economic interest in California, with one reporting estimating a potential budget of $150 million being spent to see the law overturned.

In a case of politics making strange bedfellows, California electricity producer PG&E, which has sometimes found itself opposing environmental groups, says it supports the law.

The coalition looking to overturn the measure, which passed in 2006, is led by the California Jobs Initiative (CJI). The Initiative says the law will cost California families $4,000 a year and 1.1 million jobs.

However, California’s non-partisan Legislative Analysts Office described those figures as “highly unreliable” and “essentially useless.” The law could also be a significant boon to many green tech and green energy companies, which could potentially seek to migrate to the state as energy supplies look to move away from carbon intensive generation technology, such as coal, to cleaner systems.

It could also provide significant advantages to companies that have already invested considerably in green energy platforms, companies like PG&E. Other corporations supporting the law, like Google and other Silicon Valley tech companies, say overturning it now could risk up to 500,000 such green tech jobs that would otherwise come to California.

The CJI said it is not seeking to overturn the law completely. The new ballot initiative, Proposition 23, would prevent AB 32 from being enacted until the state unemployment rate falls below 5.5 percent for four consecutive fiscal quarters.

Critics point out that has only happened three times since the 1970s, and with a current unemployment rate of more than 13 percent, it would effectively kill the legislation for the foreseeable future.

Meanwhile, oil companies like BP, Exxon and Shell have avoided giving money directly to the campaign. But these companies have been lobbying Governor Schwarzenegger regarding the manner in which the rules governing the law are designed and implemented, according to the Sacramento Bee. The Sierra Club said that the oil companies could end up having a significant voice in crafting, and potentially weakening, the rules, as they were able to do with cap-and-trade legislative drafts.

Although the legislation only effects California, which generates a relatively small amount of its electricity from coal, the measure could have a significant effect throughout the country, as California legislation often leads the way on rules changes by other states. Recently, 11 states adopted California’s fuel standards for vehicles and buildings.

California will also begin regulating the emissions of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) from electric utility equipment starting in 2011.

Run an Efficient EHS Audit Program - A How-to Guide
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

  
Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

  
Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  
Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  

4 thoughts on “Lobbyists Pull Out Checkbooks to Overturn CA Emission Law

  1. The California Jobs Initiative (CJI) is an oil corporation farce and fraud. There is no connection, whatsoever, between greenhouse gas emission reduction and the loss of jobs. This notion is an insult to the intelligence of the people of California. In fact, there is job growth in the clean, renewable energy industry. Chevron employs 65,000 worldwide and CJI is not going to change this. The only jobs created by the oil industry are clean-up jobs after oil spills and deep water, blow-outs and pump-handler jobs. CJI will make fantastic profits for the oil industry, increase air pollution, especially in the communities around their refineries, and there will not be lower gas prices.

  2. In the spirit of ruthless greed and criminal negliglence the leadership of these corporations are attempting to sabotage legislation designed to prevent further destabilisation of our planets climate. They are a threat to national security of the US and of our planet.

  3. Are we going to allow two Texas oil companies to tell California what to do? It’s an insult to our intelligence and an obviously self-serving effort on the part of these two oil companies. Let them spend money in California and then defeat their rediculous attempt at gerimandering the CA legislative process. There ought to be a law against their funding this effort in the first place.

Leave a Comment