If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Audit Finds Only 8% of U.S. Stimulus Funds for Energy Efficiency Spent

Only about 8.4 percent of the $3.2 billion that Congress voted in February as part of an economic stimulus package to provide energy and conservation block grants to states and cities has been spent by the beginning of August according to an audit (PDF) by the Energy Department’s inspector general, reports The New York Times. It also has only created or saved about 2,300 jobs as of the second quarter of this year.

As an example, the audit finds that New York City, which received the biggest funding at $80.8 million, spent only $1.5 million, or less than 2 percent, which was better than Chicago, which got $27.6 million and spent under $40,000, or 0.1 percent, according to the article.

The audit found that grant recipients, as of August 2010, spent $269.7 million for energy efficiency activities and/or projects, which was significantly less than the $675 million anticipated in the Department’s initial Project Operating Plans. In addition, three of the territories did not spend any grant money, even though funding had been awarded and was available for use, according to the audit.

Problems cited in the audit include a lack of regulations or staff to process applications at the Energy Department, and lack of staff at local governments to process applications or handle the money they received, says The New York Times. In addition, specific rules or provisions set by Congress to receive federal money has slowed spending at state and local governments.

The report found that spending delays were “prevalent and widespread throughout the Program,” particularly by those receiving the largest grants of more than $2 million each, reports The Hill. DOE officials said “spending rates have significantly increased since March 2010,” noting that recipient spending “was not a leading indicator” of the program’s overall performance.

However, The New York Times reports that the Energy Department has loosened up some rules such as increasing the size of contracts and subcontracts that states can approve without federal approval in advance from $1 million to $10 million.

Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  
The Corporate Sustainability Professional's Guide to Better Data Management
Sponsored By: Urjanet

  
Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

  
Operationalizing EHS Management: Bridge the Gap from Strategy to Execution
Sponsored By: LNS Research

  

6 thoughts on “Audit Finds Only 8% of U.S. Stimulus Funds for Energy Efficiency Spent

  1. There are many opportunities in pyro-processing and manufacturing to save large amounts of energy. These opportunities are being missed or ignored. I don’t know why. Europe and Japan are more diligent in saving energy.
    Thanks

    Milt Benjamin Sci.D.

  2. So if the Federal DOE is the bottleneck in processing applications to utilize already-awarded funding, why is this article seemingly placing blame on state and local governments? Kind of ironic that energy efficiency money is not being used efficiently.

  3. This explains why everybody tells me I should be doing tons of energy audit work. It also explains why I’m having a hard time making payroll.

  4. When Money become available for shovel ready projects, It didn’t work for me I was Under constructions and 20% completed with a hope that never came .I ask DOE for Help ( no free money ) and they refer me to the web site
    Did it mater that we are building a hotel that will use 70% less energy, and 59% less water ? NO
    But DOE Gave a Hotel corporate Franchise 15 mil GRAND to develop a hotel that will save 50% in energy and nothing is done yet.DOE Money is available for Government Jobs.
    As for me I can only say Thank Got for Private lenders
    My comments are truth and documents are available

Leave a Comment