If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Carbon Footprint of an IBM Server: Measuring the Yardstick

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon have taken on the task of walking a mile in the shoes of Product Carbon Footprint (PCF) measurement standards, in the paper (via SmartPlanet) ‘Uncertainty and Variability in Carbon Footprinting for Electronics: Case Study of an IBM Rack-mount Server.’

“The use of carbon footprinting in both policy and labeling has assumed that the techniques of carbon footprinting are capable of producing precise point estimates or at least estimates with small enough uncertainties to allow comparative assessment. However, it remains to be proven whether this level of precision is possible given large but poorly understood limitations in both methodology and data,” writes the paper’s author Christopher Weber, assistant research professor at the university.

Weber’s case study of the IBM rack-mount server found that the production phase of the product was measurable with a low degree of uncertainty, but at the use phase, accounting for 94% of the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with the product, had only predictive measurements since it was not possible to clearly determine “how and for how long the product would be used.”

Additionally, Weber brings in the variability of mix in electricity markets, delivery methods and other factors to complicate accuracy of PCF studies. Altogether, his conclusions assigned a +/- 15% range for production, a +/- 25% range for the delivery phase a +/-50% range for the use phase, and +/-35% range for the cradle to grave carbon footprint.

“This finding confirmed the importance of IBM’s ongoing efforts to increase energy efficiency of its server products and the data centers where servers are used,” said Weber, since energy efficiency in the use phase is the product attribute most likely to lower the product’s carbon footprint. He also recommends that standards writers should dictate when to use regional, country or multinational electricity mixes in future PCF standards.

Weber acknowledged that the study was based on only two “both relatively old” available data sets, but that a +/-15% margin is not an ignorable amount for a method that is already being used to set policy and make comparative environmental product declarations.

Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Packaging LED & Advanced Rooftop Unit Control (ARC) Retrofits for Maximum Performance
Sponsored By: Transformative Wave

  
Video: Expense & Data Management for Complex Payables
Sponsored By: Ecova, Inc.

  
Top 10 Steps for a Successful EMIS Project
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

  

One thought on “Carbon Footprint of an IBM Server: Measuring the Yardstick

  1. Similar effects are observed in carbon footprint calculations of dynamic XaaS offerings (eg infrastructure as a service) and virtual system offerings (eg virtual data centre and virtualised cloud synthetics). This has important implications for enterprises contemplating the use of cloud services, for example, as there is the potential to exchange Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions for much larger Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. This has many implications for enterprise programmes focussed on carbon mitigation. The clear message for enterprises is to request very specific information about the dynamic carbon footprint characteristics of the XaaS and other service offerings prior to agreeing to service level agreements.

Leave a Comment