If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

EPA Adds Ten Superfund Sites, Proposes 15

Ten Superfund sites have been added to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) National Priorities List (NPL), and the agency is proposing 15 more additions.

The additions to the NPL, the list of national priorities among the known or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants, take the number of Superfund sites to 1,290.

The EPA says the sites contain harmful contaminants including arsenic, asbestos, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, creosote, dichloroethene (DCE), dioxins, lead, mercury, pentachlorophenol (PCP), polynuclear aromatic hydrcarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), tetrachloroethene (PCE), trichloroethane (TCA), trichloroethene (TCE), and zinc.

Since Superfund’s introduction by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 1,637 sites have been listed on the NPL, and 347 of these have been deleted. Another 66 proposed sites are awaiting final agency action.

The sites added to the list yesterday are located in eight states and Puerto Rico (see chart).They include locations used for smelting, fertilizer manufacture, mining and other industrial operations, as well as an illegal dump and several sites where the cause of pollution is unknown.

The EPA identified a number of companies known to have had operations at the sites, though all of the companies have since ceased those operations or gone out of business. The NPL does not itself assign liability to any party or to the owner of any specific property.

With all Superfund sites, the agency tries to locate the parties responsible for contamination. When there are no viable potential responsible parties, the EPA will investigate the full extent of the contamination before starting significant cleanup at the site.

Superfund sites are eligible for federal investigation and cleanup funds while the EPA seeks to identify parties responsible for the pollution.

The 15 sites proposed yesterday for Superfund inclusion are:

  • Blue Ledge Mine, Rogue River – Siskiyou National Forest, Calif.
  • New Idria Mercury Mine, Idria, Calif.
  • Sandoval Zinc Company, Sandoval, Ill.
  • Gary Development Landfill, Gary, Ind.
  • Sauer Dump, Dundalk, Md.
  • Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp, Columbus, Miss.
  • Red Panther Chemical Company, Clarksdale, Miss.
  • Garfield Ground Water Contamination, Garfield, N.J.
  • MolyCorp Inc., Questa, N.M. (re-proposal)
  • New Cassel/Hicksville Ground Water Contamination, New Cassell/Hicksville, N.Y.
  • CTS of Asheville, Inc., Asheville, N.C.
  • Astoria Marine Construction Company, Ore.
  • North Ridge Estates, Klamath Falls, Ore.
  • US Finishing/Cone Mills, Greenville, S.C.
  • Alamo Contaminated Ground Water, Alamo, Tenn.
Strategies for Managing Emerging Regulations
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

Staying Ahead of the Curve: Strategies for Managing Emerging Regulations (NAEM)
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

Avoid the RFP Trap: The Smart Guide to Purchasing EHS Software
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

NAEM 2017 EHS&S Software Buyers Guide
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS


2 thoughts on “EPA Adds Ten Superfund Sites, Proposes 15

  1. Glad to hear that EPA is still working to clean up the messes that have made. Too bad the responsible parties are typically not there to pay for cleanup.
    When the EPA budget is eliminated by the crazies in Congress, perhaps all the sludges and goo can be hauled to Wisconsin, preferably in Paul Ryan’s neighborhood.

  2. How about in Superior, Wi., where ships were built in the 1940’s I believe. There is a huge dump site right on the edge of our largest fresh water lake Superior. Barrels of toxic waste were also thrown in lake Superior, and are still there leaking into the lake. What a shame, does anyone care?

Leave a Comment

Translate »