If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Environmental Enforcement: Shell UK Fined $2m for Gas Blast

Energy giant Shell UK Limited has been ordered by Norwich Crown Court to pay a total of £1,242,000 ($2.1m) in fines and costs over the explosion and fire at its Bacton gas terminal in Norfolk, England in 2008.

The explosion blew the concrete roof off a buffering tank within the plant, spreading concrete and metal debris over a large area and sucking a nearby drain out of the ground. After investigating the incident, the U.K.’s Health and Safety Executive and its Environment Agency jointly prosecuted the firm over safety, environmental control and pollution-prevention failures at the plant.

Investigators traced the cause of the explosion to a leak of highly flammable hydrocarbon liquid into a part of the plant responsible for treating wastewater before discharging it into the sea.

The leak was caused by the failure of a corroded metal separator vessel, which allowed water contaminated with the highly flammable condensate to enter a concrete storage tank where it was heated by an electric heater. The heater’s elements were exposed within the tank, raising the surface temperature significantly, leading to the explosion and fire.

The court heard that during the incident there was an unauthorized release into the North Sea, which ought to have been prevented, of 850 metric tons of fire-fighting foam and water.

Shell UK had failed to close the sea gate until about an hour after the fire started, the court found. It also failed to notify the Environment Agency, as required, meaning that valuable advice on environmental protection during the incident and its aftermath was not available to either Shell or the fire service – an emergency response priority first identified in 2004. The delay in notification also meant an assessment of environmental harm was not possible, the court heard.

At an earlier hearing Shell pleaded guilty to seven charges covering safety, environmental control and pollution-prevention failures at the plant that led to the blast.

Shell UK was fined a total of £1,000,000 and ordered to pay £242,000 in costs.

The Environment Agency environment manager for Norfolk and Suffolk, Marcus Sibley, said: “The explosion could have led to a major environmental disaster as other highly flammable materials were stored nearby.”

“What happened was completely unacceptable and falls well below the standards that we set for ourselves. Safety is our company’s priority and so an incident like this is deeply disappointing,” Shell UK said in a statement on Monday, Reuters reports.

Operationalizing EHS Management: Bridge the Gap from Strategy to Execution
Sponsored By: LNS Research

  
Practical Guide to Transforming Energy Data into Better Buildings
Sponsored By: Lucid

  
Just the Facts: 8 Popular Misconceptions about LEDs & Controls
Sponsored By: Digital Lumens

  
Video: Expense & Data Management for Complex Payables
Sponsored By: Ecova, Inc.

  

One thought on “Environmental Enforcement: Shell UK Fined $2m for Gas Blast

  1. Oil Spill Eater II ( OSE II ) has been used on numerous sites in the Ogoniland and cleaned these oil polluted sites up to pre spill conditions, and this has been agreed to by NOSDRA. IN December of 2013 OSE II was used on a 550,000 liter spill in Nigeria from the Brass terminal, and in less than three weeks the regulators commented they could not believe there had ever been a spill in the Bayelsa river state region. The responders directly handled OSE II with no adverse health problems, since OSE II does not contain any harmful chemicals. The fishing was shut down for three weeks and when the fisherman returned the seafood had been protected from the spill clean up operations, since OSE II causes oil to float. Dispersants cause oil to sink into the water column spreading the spills initial impact to secondary areas causing seafood to become contaminated. The spill went out into the atalantic then covered the shorelines as well as rivers and creeks. OSE II was first applied on the open water preventing any further oil from coming ashore and then the shorelines and sensitive mangroves were cleaned up. With OSE II there was no natural resources destroyed, and the spill area was returned to pre spill conditions. This is one of the worlds first large oil spills that was addressed with OSE II a first response bioremediation product, that is safe for humans, non toxic to marine species, diminishes the adhesion properties so birds and wildlife are protected, and in less than a month this normally devastating spill was turned into a non issue, saving the natural resources, reducing clean up costs, and prevented natural resource destruction. OSE II proved there is a safe efficient means to address large or any size spill.

Leave a Comment