If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Factory Farming Is Not the Best We Have to Offer

Over the last half-century in the US, small farms have been replaced by large, industrialized operations that treat animals and the natural world as mere commodities.  This factory farming system, which slaughters animals by the billions, costs us all dearly.

The Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production (PCIFAP), which included experts like former USDA Secretary Dan Glickman, conducted “a comprehensive, fact-based and balanced examination of key aspects of the farm animal industry,” which concluded: “Industrial farm animal production systems are largely unregulated, and many practices common to this method of production threaten public health, the environment, animal health and well-being, and rural communities.”

Against Our Better Natures

Factory farms confine animals by the thousands in massive warehouses. Millions are packed in cages and crates so tightly that they can’t walk, turn around or even stretch their limbs. According to agribusiness research, more than 40 percent of consumers think that our country is on the wrong track in terms of how we produce food, with another 20 percent uncertain about the soundness of our food supply. And yet the majority of people are not acting on these misgivings. Agribusiness counts on this complacency, but we can’t afford it. In thoughtlessly consuming what the industry puts in front of us – in choosing to ignore the suffering it exacts – we are complicit not only in the denial of the sensitive, intelligent nature of the animals who become our food but also in the denial of our own natural sensitivities and intelligence.

Against Our Better Interests

Beyond this moral dilemma, factory farming has significant implications for our welfare and the viability of our planet. As just one example, stressed and confined in filthy, cramped quarters, factory farmed animals are constantly at risk for disease. Agribusiness relies on the regular administration of drugs and chemicals to keep the animals alive and productive. The majority of the antibiotics sold in the U.S. are given to farm animals. This overuse has been linked to increased drug resistance in common bacteria, a phenomenon that diminishes our ability to treat illness in humans.

According to a United Nations report, factory farming is also one of the top contributors to our planet’s most significant environmental problems, including “land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution and loss of biodiversity.” Raising animals for food is terribly wasteful, demanding vast quantities of increasingly scarce resources, including water, topsoil and fossil fuels, and the exorbitant quantities of excrement generated by factory farming poison our land, water and air, threatening both ecosystems and human communities.

For Change

By educating ourselves, urging our elected representatives to support reforms, and requesting more plant-based foods in our grocery stores and restaurants, we will be the change our food system needs.  Through farmer’s markets, CSAs and community gardens, we can cultivate a food supply that centers on eating plants instead of animals; that supports our health instead of undermining it; and that helps us preserve the natural world and our relationship to it – a food system that connects us to the best we have to offer each other.

Baur, and more than 30 experts from across the public health, environmental, and animal welfare movements, will be speaking about the consequences of factory farming at the first National Conference to End Factory Farming: For Health, Environment and Farm Animals in Arlington, Va., on October 27-29. For more information and to register, visit www.factoryfarmingconference.org.

Gene Baur, president and co-founder of Farm Sanctuary, campaigns to raise awareness about the negative consequences of factory farming. He has conducted hundreds of visits to farms, stockyards and slaughterhouses to document conditions, and his photos and videos exposing factory farming cruelty have been aired nationally and internationally, educating millions. His book, Farm Sanctuary: Changing Hearts and Minds About Animals and Food, a national best-seller, is a thought-provoking investigation of the ethical questions surrounding beef, poultry, pork, milk, and egg production — as well as what each of us can do to promote compassion and help stop the systematic mistreatment of the billions of farm animals who are exploited for food in the U.S. every year.

Merging Industrial Air and Water Pollution Solutions Provides Better Results, Lower Cost
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

Staying Ahead of the Curve: Strategies for Managing Emerging Regulations (NAEM)
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

Strategies for Managing Emerging Regulations
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

How Tracking/Managing Energy Consumption Drives Real Cost Savings
Sponsored By: Digital Lumens


2 thoughts on “Factory Farming Is Not the Best We Have to Offer

  1. Gene – I can see it would not be in our productive interests to debate with you on the issue of raising animals in warehouses. But within our agro-ecological system that humans depend on for food, I do believe that animals play an important role in keeping the ecosystems functioning in the most natural and productive means. Meat is the great herbaceous-storing battery and livestock complements the soil biota. I think any tour of an industry that seeks out the most disturbing aspects will generate and adverse opinion. Take a broader view of livestock agro-ecology and you will see that it does provide many ecologica and economic values.

  2. My father (who is a vegetarian for both health and ethical/moral reasons) frequently cites an example of how impractical it is to rely on meat. He begins with a question: How much grains and feed does a cow or pig need to eat before it reaches a certain weight? Take the total amount of feed and divide it by the amount of actual meat we are able to consume from the livestock. It takes X lbs. of feed to produce Y lbs. of meat. What if we reduced our reliance on meat, and instead use the space we occupy to grow the plants for feed. That would be a more practical use of the land. Some people might think this example might be overly-simplified but it begs the question: Are we doing right by the population?

    Projections estimate that the global population will hit 7 billion by 2011. It will keep on growing. HOW ARE WE GOING TO FEED ALL THESE PEOPLE?

    Lets not forget the amount of antibiotics we feed to the livestock. We might possibly be inadvertently breeding super bacteria that might jump to us. What then? Another mad dash to produce a miracle drug?

    Juan Miguel Ruiz (Going Green)

Leave a Comment

Translate »