If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

UN Documents Propose Mandatory Sustainability Reporting

Two influential documents – the Rio+20 negotiating text and the recommendations of the U.N. secretary general’s High Level Panel on Global Sustainability – both propose tighter sustainability reporting requirements for businesses, according to Chatham House fellow Paul Hohnen, writing in the Guardian.

In “Resilient People, Resilient Planet – A Future Worth Choosing,” published yesterday, the U.N. panel said one idea to consider is mandatory reporting by companies with market caps over $100 million. The paper also said that business groups should work with governments and international agencies to come up with a framework covering sustainable development reporting.

Zero Draft, the negotiating text for the U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development (known as Rio+20), calls for global policy to require all listed and large private companies to integrate sustainability into their reporting. According to Hohnen – formerly a diplomat, director of Greenpeace International and director of the Global Reporting Initiative – the language in the text echoes that which emerged from the 1992 Rio de Janeiro and 2002 Johannesburg summits, encouraging voluntary reporting.

The fate of these recommendations during negotiations in the next few months is “anyone’s guess,” Hohnen says. But in a new Chatham House paper, he argues that they are just the right questions for governments to be discussing now.

He says that sustainability reporting as practiced today suffers from several problems that need to be addressed. Among them, only a small proportion of multinationals currently report on their sustainability impacts, and the reporting varies greatly in quality.

Hohnen says that sustainability reporting will not reach its full potential without government mandates, at least for the biggest companies. He says the best way to do this would be for the participants at Rio+20 to adopt a “report or explain” framework, meaning that all governments would agree to require large companies to either disclose sustainability performance or explain why they don’t. Governments could enact this type of system – already in place in Denmark – through policy and regulation or through stock exchange listing requirements.

Earlier this month the Brazilian stock exchange, BM&FBOVESPA, recommended that its listed companies follow a report-or-explain protocol. And last year environmental groups in the U.K. made their case for the value of mandatory carbon reporting after a government study put a price tag of about $9.8 billion (£6 billion) for the cost of such a reporting policy to British businesses over ten years.

Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  
Just the Facts: 8 Popular Misconceptions about LEDs & Controls
Sponsored By: Digital Lumens

  
Leveraging EHS Software in Support of Culture Changes
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

  
Right On Time
Sponsored By: Gensuite

  

2 thoughts on “UN Documents Propose Mandatory Sustainability Reporting

  1. When “sustainability”, as you are referring to it here, is economically advantageous, private companies will do it without being coerced.
    We don’t need a “one world order” telling everyone what to do.
    That just makes everything more expensive for everyone and lowers the standard of living for everyone because fewer people can afford the things they need and want because the world order has imposed new requirements that make the cost of making everything more expensive.

  2. @Ira
    … and meanwhile, AGW, water use practices, agricultural practices, etc., will contribute to a global condition that is so changed from the current condition; that societies the world over will pay vastly increased costs to cope, as best they can. The costs will include economic ones, social ones, increased human suffering, increased risk of future conflicts over scarce and shifting resources, etc.
    The reason we need governmental incentives, laws, regulations, and general ‘prodding’; is to mitigate some of those increased costs and societal burdens resulting from unaddressed AGW. Private companies, as you acknowledge, are not stepping up to the plate on their own.

Leave a Comment