If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Companies’ Sustainability Improves – But Reputations Worsen

AXA, Coca-Cola, Deustche Bank, EADS, General Electric and L’Oreal – companies that last year were not getting enough credit for their actual environmental, social and governance performance – have now earned reputations that match their relatively high sustainability achievements, according to a report by Brandlogic and CRD Analytics.

The 2012 study, which analyzes real versus perceived sustainability performance for 100 companies that collectively account for about 16 percent of gross world product, found corporations face growing skepticism among professional investors, supply chain officials and recent higher education graduates.

Last year, 66 of the 100 brands analyzed had perception scores ahead of their reality scores. This year, while 93 corporations increased their real performance scores over last year, and in some cases significantly, 68 of the companies saw a decline in their perception scores (SPS).

The report includes a Sustainability IQ Matrix (pictured above), a visual framework that plots each of the 100 companies across four quadrants: “Challengers,” “Leaders,” “Laggards” and “Promoters.” Leaders have relatively high performance and reputation; laggards show a relatively low commitment to ESG and low reputation; promoters are credited with ESG performance ahead of their actual achievement; and challengers do not get enough credit for their ESG performance.

Newly added companies SAP, Dell and John Deere entered the study as “leaders,” joining Dell, AXA, Coca-Cola, Deustche Bank, EADS, General Electric, L’Oreal, BMW and Intel.

The other three new additions – Barclays, Facebook and H&M – join their global brand peers as laggards.

Challengers, or companies that outperformed their reputations, include UPS, Citi, Shell, BP, ExxonMobil and Bank of America.

About one-fifth of companies increased their sustainability reality score (SRS) by more than 10 points and seven of these by more than 24 points on the 100-point index. These gains led to a significant nine-point rise in the mean SRS score of the 100 companies from 42.4 points in 2011 to 51.7 points in 2012.

In comparison, the mean score of the 100 studied companies on the SPS perceived performance index dropped almost three points from 47.2 in 2011 to 44.5 this year. Some 27 companies fell more than five points, with 12 of these declining more than eight points.

Twelve of the 2012 leaders who were in the same category last year slipped in their perceived performance. These were IBM, Colgate-Palmolive, Walt Disney, Abbott Labs, Novo Nordisk, GSK, ABB, 3M, Intel, Cisco, Accenture and Nokia.

Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  
Run an Efficient EHS Audit Program - A How-to Guide
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

  
Financing Environmental Resiliency and a Low-Carbon Future with Green Bonds
Sponsored By: NSF International

  
The Corporate Sustainability Professional's Guide to Better Data Management
Sponsored By: Urjanet

  

One thought on “Companies’ Sustainability Improves – But Reputations Worsen

  1. The reason they’re not “getting enough credit” is that all of the afore mentioned companies are green-washers.

    Now, I don’t have the three or so years available to list all of the problems, atrocities and inhumane practices that these companies are still committing, but I will take a minute to say this: There is a huge difference between a company that wants to save money by “going Green”, and a company who understands that they will save money by going green in areas related to energy/water/waste/practices, and additionally, take into account – and take action through – social responsibility, environmental responsibility and biological responsibility.

Leave a Comment