If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Waste Management Helps Firms Achieve Zero Waste Validation

Waste ManagementWaste Management is offering its customers a streamlined route to pursuing Underwriters Laboratories Environment zero waste validation.

Many businesses, schools and communities across North America want to achieve zero waste, but “vague and often conflicting definitions” make it difficult, says Tom Carpenter, a director in WM’s sustainability services division.

The UL Environment claim validation, which recognizes entities that have achieved certain waste diversion milestones, sets a clear standard, WM says. While pursuit of zero waste is an on-going process of improvement, Carpenter says many organizations ask for intermediate benchmarks to validate their progress.

WM says it will help customers implement strategies to increase waste diversion rates, manage diversion programs on an on-going basis, and obtain the data required by UL Environment for the validation process. The tiered claim validation structure provides three claims for which customers can receive validation:

  • The zero waste to landfill claim is validated by UL Environment when an organization can prove that it consistently achieves a landfill waste diversion rate of 100 percent.
  • Virtually zero waste to landfill validation is for an organization that has achieved a landfill diversion rate of 98 percent or greater.
  • The landfill diversion rate validation is for an organization that has achieved a landfill diversion rate of greater than or equal to 80 percent.

Once the waste diversion data is validated by UL Environment, organizations can include the UL Environment claim validation mark on marketing materials.

Carpenter says organizations can also benefit from the designation by promoting their leadership in environmental stewardship and acquiring this data for use in supplier scorecards or other sustainability-related publications and filings.

He says that because the waste diversion claims are transparent and clearly defined, organizations will be able to demonstrate their exact level of environmental leadership to the marketplace. This type of leadership can translate into improved market share and competitiveness.

More than 75 communities have recycled 179 million pounds of materials in one year and citizens have collected $4 million in rewards under a program launched last year by Waste Management and  recycling incentive company Recyclebank.

Waste Management, which invested in Recyclebank’s parent company Recycle Rewards in 2011, plans to expand the program to more than 20 additional communities over the next several months.

 

Six Steps to Navigating EHS & Compliance
Sponsored By: UL EHS Sustainability

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
Run an Efficient EHS Audit Program - A How-to Guide
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

  
Just the Facts: 8 Popular Misconceptions about LEDs & Controls
Sponsored By: Digital Lumens

  

6 thoughts on “Waste Management Helps Firms Achieve Zero Waste Validation

  1. I’m embarrased that a publication called “Environmental Leader” doesn’t even know the difference between “Zero Waste” and “ZW to Landfill”. Really? You didn’t know that a true ZW community does NOT burn trash, but that ZW to Landfill DEPENDS upon burning trash to achieve it’s goal? Do you just publish any press release Waste Management sends you as if it’s news? C’mon EL, you’ve gotta do better than this!
    Eric Lombardi
    Executive Director
    Eco-Cycle Inc.

  2. Waste management owns many incinerators AND landfills throughout the US which is in opposition to Zero Waste. This is just another attempt by WM to greenwash their image. And it failed again.

  3. When stuff being sent to an incinerator, it is far from Zero Waste. Incinerators still send semi toxic ash to landfills while producing expensive and polluting energy. I would think your publication would know what real Zero Waste is. I’m doubting your “Leadership.”

  4. Actually, this is inaccurate because I heard at an ANSI meeting today that UL will have to change they’re definition of zero waste to be the true definition: zero waste to landfill, incineration, and the environment.
    And by the way, there are many businesses and communities that have TRULY achieved zero waste.

  5. WM seems to believe that an untruth repeated often enough will be accepted. Shame on EL for being the unquestioning messenger. Real zero waste doesn’t destroy resources and it doesn’t need a landfill or a “burner”. If EL looked for some leadership outside the old corporate dinosaurs, it find some worthy stories.

Leave a Comment