If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Seattle Businesses May Face Increased Mandatory Recycling

SeattleThe city of Seattle is considering making it compulsory for businesses to recycle glass, plastic, tin and aluminum.

The legislation, which would be effective from July 2014, was introduced Sept. 12 by councilmember Jean Godden. It is currently mandatory for businesses to recycle paper and cardboard.

Six months of educational outreach to businesses would be conducted before the requirement takes effect, with one-and-a-half years before the use of civil infractions for enforcement, according to the city of Seattle. Civil infractions would total $50 for a third offense, according to the Seattle Times.

Seattle businesses discard more than 8,000 tons of recyclable bottles and cans in the landfill every year. By 2019, this ban should increase Seattle’s recycling rate by 1.1 percent over current levels and reduce recyclables that go to the landfill by 6,000 tons, or more than 200 shipping containers, per year, the city says.

Regardless the size or type of business, switching to a strong recycling program is expected to save companies’ money, the city says. Savings will range from $55 per month for a small restaurant to $1,522 for a large office building, according to Seattle Public Utilities. Steve Cornell, a commercial and residential property manager in the city, says getting businesses to identify recyclables and put them in recycle bins may prove difficult, the newspaper reports.

Residential customers have been required  to recycle cardboard, paper, glass, plastic, tin and aluminum since 2005.

Energy conservation measures enacted at facilities operated by the city of Seattle saved the municipality and taxpayers $1.25 million since 2008, according to an official report released in May.

The report covers 6.2 million square feet of city-owned and operated building space, a process that the city is also requiring owners of mid-sized and large privately owned buildings to do every year.

The assessment found that city-owned downtown buildings are more energy efficient than the national average. The Seattle Municipal Tower has an EPA Energy Star score of 93 out of 100, compared to a national average of 50. This means the building is more energy efficient than 92 percent of similar buildings nationwide, according to the report.

Picture Credit: David Herrera via Flickr

Environmental Leader Product & Project Awards 2018
Sponsored By: Environmental Leader

Environmental Leader Product and Project Awards 2016
Sponsored By: Environmental Leader

Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

OSHA ITA Cheat Sheet
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS


One thought on “Seattle Businesses May Face Increased Mandatory Recycling

  1. “Steve Cornell, a commercial and residential property manager in the city, says getting businesses to identify recyclables and put them in recycle bins may prove difficult, the newspaper reports.”
    This kind of statement just makes my blood boil. C’mon people this is kids stuff. Are seriously telling me in the year 2013, people still find it hard to recycle or identify what is recyclable. I believe it is more about municipalities not wanting to spend the money to provide the services that make it easy for people to recycle or to sort recyclables when people get it wrong. They just need to grow up and have the guts to put recycling fees on packaging to cover their costs. When people are educated on the benfits of recycling and someone takes the time to show them and make it easy for them, they are usually quite happy to comply. This kind of statement is almost the same as saying “its hard to get people to think” which I grant you is sometimes true, but battles hard won are all the more savoured.

Leave a Comment

Translate »