If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Climate Change and Big Business: Bridging the Gap

beck, christopher, homeinsurance.comOf the 10 most expensive hurricanes in US history, eight occurred within the past decade. To a lot of people, the increased severity of storms points directly at climate change.

Personally, I’m fascinated by the effect of climate change on various U.S. industries. Many are big, powerful, and now vulnerable. Some of these sectors rely on weather patterns. After suffering through droughts, flooding, and superstorms such as Hurricane Sandy; big business sectors, I believe, are starting to see the need to engage more fully in the climate change discussion. I would like to discuss three industries today and why I think they should be more actively engaged in finding solutions to climate change.


I work in insurance, and I know firsthand that climate change is a direct threat to our industry. We deal with risk on a daily basis, and one of the largest risks insurers have to consider is severe weather. Hurricane Sandy and Irene caused nearly $100 billion worth of damage, and about a third of that was paid out by insurers. Insurance companies exist to protect people and businesses and they are fully prepared when severe weather strikes a community. However, more frequent, stronger storms and unpredictable weather aren’t good for business.

In June 2013, an insurance research group called the Geneva Association release a report called “Warming of the Oceans and Implications for the (Re)insurance Industry.” The report explained that rising ocean temperatures are shifting climate patterns. The report also called for a “paradigm shift” in the way the insurance industry calculate risk.

Traditionally, insurers have predicted the future by studying the past, but due to climate change the past can no longer reliably predict the future. Consider 2013, which many models predicted would be a record year for strong hurricanes: At peak season, we’ve seen very little activity. This is obviously a good thing, but with predictions being so out of whack, it says to me that insurers need updated risk models.

Many insurance providers have embraced the topic of climate change. With updated risk models, they can work closely with regulators to set more accurate price signals to balance both risk and consumer needs. Insurance companies can also help communities plan better for climate change and encourage more durable, sustainable homes and buildings.


The relationship between climate change and agriculture is a bit more complicated. The glaring reason for this is that the agriculture industry directly contributes to the problem of climate change by producing tons of carbon emissions. Globally, the agriculture industry accounts for roughly one-third of our greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report released in 2012 by the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. But while contributing largely to the problem, the agricultural industry relies heavily on weather patterns for growing crops. Droughts, floods and other severe weather can cripple farms leading to lost profit, food shortages and potentially famine.

Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

Become a More Effective EHS Leader for Your Retail Business
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS

Run an Efficient EHS Audit Program - A How-to Guide
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

Avoid the RFP Trap: The Smart Guide to Purchasing EHS Software
Sponsored By: VelocityEHS


3 thoughts on “Climate Change and Big Business: Bridging the Gap

  1. AAEC has a technology available for insurance firms and/or others to invest in at the ground floor level and that offers a grassroots approach to addressing climate change in such a way so as to minimize their losses over time. Google Les Blevins and advanced alternative energy for more info or contact us via our webpage.

  2. Climate change reporting has done to journalism what naughty priests did for religion and served as a lazy copy and paste news editor’s dream come true and not ONCE did you mention that it was only a consensus of “maybe” not “will be”.

  3. 98% of climate scientists agree about AGW. The latest IPCC report places a 95% confidence in AGW. Virtually all scientific organizations all over the globe have publicly stated their support of AGW – including but not limited to the National Academy of Science, perhaps the premier scientific organization in the US. The evidence for, and the acceptance of, AGW is quite literally overwhelming.
    In fact, mememine69 and similar trolls are virtually the only people still living in a fantasy land called ‘state of denial’.

Leave a Comment

Translate »