If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now
BSR Resilience Wedges

Why Firms Should Take Climate Change Action

BSR Resilience WedgesMobilizing industry to take action to slow climate change involves translating climate risks for business, building an “architecture of participation” for climate action, and stabilizing the climate system through “resilience wedges,” says a study by Business for Social Responsibility.

In its report, Business in a Climate-Constrained World: Catalyzing a Climate-Resilient Future through the Power of the Private Sector, BSR says business is increasingly exposed to risks from climate change, with some estimates putting the cumulative global cost as high as $4 trillion by 2030.

While many businesses are already beginning to act — with 84 percent of Global 500 companies reporting that they have emissions-reductions targets, and 75 percent reporting that they have already reduced emissions in some areas of their business — the report highlights the need for a greater commitment to ambition to match the volume of activity.

To address this gap in the level of corporate ambition on climate, BSR proposes a three-part strategy:

  1. Translate climate risks for business.
  2. Invest in collaboration to create an “architecture of participation” for climate action, allowing industries and other stakeholders to help each other and the communities in which they operate.
  3. Stabilize the climate system through “resilience wedges” proposed by BSR. These wedges — which BSR will develop based on the stabilization wedges created by Princeton University professors Robert Socolow and Stephen Pacala — will identify meaningful action through manageable steps related to both greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and adaptation across eight industry clusters: consumer products, food/beverage/agriculture, energy and extractives, information and communications technology, healthcare, financial services, transportation and logistics, and travel and tourism.

The BSR report follows the grim prognosis delivered by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) this month. The IPCC, the UN’s top panel on climate change, said in its April report that emissions grew more quickly between 2000 and 2010 than in each of the three previous decades.

 

 

Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  
Financing Environmental Resiliency and a Low-Carbon Future with Green Bonds
Sponsored By: NSF International

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
6 Things to Consider When Deciding Whether to Build or Buy Software
Sponsored By: Progressly

  

Leave a Comment