If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now

Low-Carbon Energy System Could Save $1.8 Trillion

Climate Policy InitiativeTwo studies by the Climate Policy Initiative released yesterday indicate that with the right policies in place, a low-carbon energy system could free up trillions of dollars over the next 20 years.

The reports were commissioned by the New Climate Economy project as part of research conducted for the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate.

The first report compares the costs of low-carbon electricity and low-carbon transportation systems with current systems. The second report focuses on the risk of losses in the financial value of existing fossil fuel assets, or asset stranding.

Key findings from the reports include:

  • Governments, rather than private investors and corporations, face the majority of stranding risk, since governments own 50 percent to 70 percent of global oil, gas, and coal resources, as well as collect taxes and royalties on the portion they do not own.
  • Transitioning to a low-carbon electricity system would bring the global economy an estimated $1.8 trillion in financial savings between 2015 and 2035.
  • Transitioning from oil to low-carbon transport could increase global investment capacity by trillions or result in net costs, depending on policy choices. Regions that import more oil than they produce — including the US, Europe, China and India — stand to benefit most from reducing their oil consumption in favor of low-carbon alternatives.
  • Coal offers the largest emissions reductions for the least loss in financial value, and transitioning away from coal can achieve 80 percent of the needed emissions reductions for just 12 percent of the asset value at risk.

Coal-powered energy is one of the most environmentally expensive industries and costs the economy more in environmental damage than it generates in revenue, according to a UN-backed report released last year.

In addition, last year the World Bank agreed to all but stop its financing of coal plants, limiting such financing to “rare circumstances,” and to countries that have “no feasible alternatives” to coal.

Is Energy-From-Waste Worse Than Coal?
Sponsored By: Covanta Environmental Solutions

  
Packaging LED & Advanced Rooftop Unit Control (ARC) Retrofits for Maximum Performance
Sponsored By: Transformative Wave

  
Approaches to Managing EHS&S Data
Sponsored By: Enablon

  
Environmental Leader Product and Project Awards 2017
Sponsored By: Environmental Leader

  

One thought on “Low-Carbon Energy System Could Save $1.8 Trillion

  1. On the surface, these reports sound so good that one wonders why the world’s governments have it already enacted these eco-friendly energy systems. Unfortunately, if it sounds too good to be true it probably is as similar reports like these I’ve read usually require unbelievably massive expenditures on the parts of governments in public transportation systems, even as many Third World governments don’t have enough money to pay for basic public services to their citizens. Expecting them to spend billions they don’t have in the hope that maybe they’ll see some cost savings over the next 20 years is sheer folly.

Leave a Comment