If you've no account register here first time
User Name :
User Email :
Password :

Login Now
landfill

California Considers Mandatory Extender Producer Responsibility Law for Packaging Waste

landfillManufacturers may soon be responsible for managing their packaging waste in California as state regulators move forward with a mandatory program covering end-of-life management for packaging.

Last September, the director of the California Department of Resources Recovery and Recycling (CalRecycle), sent an internal memo to staff to develop “a mandatory comprehensive, statewide packaging program” to reduce the amount of packaging that ends up in landfills — 8 million tons annually, or about a quarter of California’s total waste stream.

This included an extender producer responsibility (EPR) system. Such systems require manufacturers to fund and manage recycling and disposal programs for their products. Proponents say they divert waste from landfills and increase recycling rates while also saving money and creating recycling jobs

As Resource Recycling reports, the state next week will hold a meeting to discuss what an end-of-life management program for packing would look like. CalRecycle told the publication that the March 22 meeting is part of “an extensive public consultation process to gather feedback during development of the model.”

While manufacturers in more than 30 states and even some local jurisdictions must comply with EPR laws — these cover paint, carpet, electronics and batteries, pharmaceuticals and medical waste, fluorescent lighting, thermostats and mattresses, among other things — no US state has adopted a mandatory EPR system for packaging.

Rhode Island and Connecticut have considered EPR laws to finance and manage their recycling systems, and some Canadian provinces, including British Columbia, have them on the books, Resource Recycling says.

Connecticut’s EPR bill was met with strong opposition from the Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, WasteDive reports.

 

 

The EHS Guidebook: Selecting, Implementing, and Using EHS Software Solutions
Sponsored By: EtQ

  
eBook: Driving Visibility and Harmonization in EHS Practices
Sponsored By: Sphera Solutions

  
Choosing the Correct Emission Control Technology
Sponsored By: Anguil Environmental Systems

  
The New Energy Future - Challenges and Opportunities in Corporate Energy Management
Sponsored By: Edison Energy

  

One thought on “California Considers Mandatory Extender Producer Responsibility Law for Packaging Waste

  1. Continual activities to add expenses to manufacturers for the packaging needed to protect their product through distribution ignores the handling methods of all third party distribution companies. if packages were handled with more care, packaging could be reduced. We need to look for the root cause of the need for all the packaging. Let’s share a little of the responsibility rather than placing the entire blame on the manufacturer.

Leave a Comment